These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

221 related items for PubMed ID: 1341732

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Evaluation of two skeletal and dental class III cases: 10 years postretention.
    Doğan S, Sabah ME.
    World J Orthod; 2004; 5(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 15615139
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Three-dimensional evaluation of skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions.
    Janson GR, Metaxas A, Woodside DG, de Freitas MR, Pinzan A.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):406-18. PubMed ID: 11298314
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Use of the centroid method of occlusion for studying the vertical and horizontal relationship of the mandible and maxilla.
    Murata S.
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):600-4. PubMed ID: 17873144
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Non-extraction treatment of a thirteen-year-old boy with a Class III skeletal discrepancy and severe crowding in both the upper and lower dentitions.
    Robinson JA.
    Aust Orthod J; 2000 Mar; 16(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 11201960
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. [Morphological studies on the bimaxillary protrusion patients. Part 3. Angle Class III malocclusion comparatively analyzed with Class I and Class II patients (author's transl)].
    Iwasawa T, Shimizu N, Yamauchi E, Yamada W, Fujiwara K.
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1980 Jun; 39(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 6935310
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Sagittal lip positions in different skeletal malocclusions: a cephalometric analysis.
    Joshi M, Wu LP, Maharjan S, Regmi MR.
    Prog Orthod; 2015 Jun; 16():8. PubMed ID: 26061982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. An investigation of cephalometric and morphological predictors of successful twin block therapy.
    Fleming PS, Qureshi U, Pandis N, DiBiase A, Lee RT.
    Aust Orthod J; 2012 Nov; 28(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 23304967
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Children with class III malocclusion: development of multivariate statistical models to predict future need for orthognathic surgery.
    Schuster G, Lux CJ, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A.
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Apr; 73(2):136-45. PubMed ID: 12725369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.