These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


134 related items for PubMed ID: 1351612

  • 1. Undue burden of abortion.
    Charo A.
    Lancet; 1992 Jul 04; 340(8810):44. PubMed ID: 1351612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.
    Benshoof J.
    Womens Health Issues; 1993 Jul 04; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Reproductive rights in jeopardy. The Supreme Court upholds restrictions on abortion.
    Gleeson K.
    ZPG Report; 1992 Sep 04; 24(4):7. PubMed ID: 12317715
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Abortion on the Supreme Court agenda: Planned Parenthood v. Casey and its possible consequences.
    Koslov TI.
    Law Med Health Care; 1992 Sep 04; 20(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 1434769
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Supreme Court refuses South Dakota appeal in parental notice case.
    Reprod Freedom News; 1996 May 03; 5(9):2. PubMed ID: 12291324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
    Fed Report; 1991 Oct 21; 947():682-727. PubMed ID: 11648596
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Court lifts ban on enforcing Miss. anti-abortion law.
    Denniston L.
    Sun; 1992 Aug 07; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12286287
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Supreme Court bars mandatory parental role in minors' abortions.
    Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Aug 07; 8(4):37-9. PubMed ID: 12278191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Speech, privacy, and the power of the purse: lessons from the abortion "gag rule" case.
    Wing KR.
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1992 Aug 07; 17(1):163-75. PubMed ID: 1619248
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The Supreme Court upholds parental notice requirements.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1990 Aug 07; 22(4):177-81. PubMed ID: 2226749
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Supreme Court issues limited ruling in challenge to Utah abortion ban.
    Reprod Freedom News; 1996 Jun 28; 5(11):2. PubMed ID: 12291525
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Appeals court finds Utah late abortion restrictions unconstitutional.
    Reprod Freedom News; 1995 Sep 15; 4(16):2. PubMed ID: 12320245
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Forced counseling, delays continue as mainstays of antiabortion agenda.
    Saul R.
    State Reprod Health Monit; 1997 Jun 15; 8(2):8-9. PubMed ID: 12348028
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 13 June 1988.
    United States. District Court, Eastern District of Pennyslvania.
    Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988 Jun 15; 15():45. PubMed ID: 12289570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.