These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

134 related items for PubMed ID: 1351612

  • 21. Comment: United States Supreme Court upholds right to abortion subject to increased state regulation. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    Cerny RA.
    J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Jul; 25(7):212-5. PubMed ID: 10183821
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. The Supreme Court, liberty, and abortion.
    Annas GJ.
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Aug 27; 327(9):651-4. PubMed ID: 1640971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. The Supreme Court retreats another step on abortion.
    Rosoff JI.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1990 Aug 27; 22(4):182-3. PubMed ID: 2226750
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Planned Parenthood v Casey. The impact of the new undue burden standard on reproductive health care.
    Benshoof J.
    JAMA; 1993 May 05; 269(17):2249-57. PubMed ID: 8474205
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. The road to moderation: the significance of Webster for legislation restricting abortion.
    Wardle LD.
    Law Med Health Care; 1989 May 05; 17(4):376-83. PubMed ID: 2628653
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. U.S. Supreme Court refuses to review decision invalidating provisions in Louisiana parental consent law.
    Reprod Freedom News; 1997 Oct 31; 6(18):2. PubMed ID: 12321265
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Issue update: parental notification.
    Rhodes AM.
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1992 Oct 31; 17(3):155. PubMed ID: 1625541
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. The summer of our discontent.
    O'Connor J.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1992 Oct 31; 22(5):28-9. PubMed ID: 1428832
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. State court finds Michigan mandatory delay law unconstitutional.
    Reprod Freedom News; 1994 Jul 22; 3(14):2-3. PubMed ID: 12287945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.
    Van Detta JA.
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001 Jul 22; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. A chill wind blows: Webster, obstetrics, and the health of women.
    Chavkin W, Rosenfield A.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Aug 22; 163(2):450-2. PubMed ID: 2386130
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. State abortion statutes on the eve of the Supreme Court's decision in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    Terwilliger LM.
    J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Jun 22; 25(6):161-74. PubMed ID: 10123589
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. New abortion laws introduce informed and parental consent.
    Family Plan World; 1991 Jun 22; 1(2):25. PubMed ID: 12284517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. The Casey undue burden standard: problems predicted and encountered, and the split over the Salerno test.
    Burdick R.
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1996 Jun 22; 23():825-76. PubMed ID: 16086482
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Roe v. Wade. Revisiting the fundamentals.
    Benshoof J.
    Conscience; 1998 Jun 22; 18(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 12178876
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Appeals court upholds North Dakota law based on lenient interpretation.
    Reprod Freedom News; 1994 Feb 25; 3(4):2. PubMed ID: 12345513
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Effect of the Human Genome Initiative on women's rights and reproductive decisions.
    Charo RA.
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 1993 Apr 25; 8(Suppl. 1):148-59. PubMed ID: 11653014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Akron Center for Reproductive Health v. Slaby, 12 August 1988.
    United States. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
    Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988 Apr 25; 15():46-7. PubMed ID: 12289574
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Federal court holds first live evidentiary hearing on mandatory delay since Casey.
    Reprod Freedom News; 1994 Jun 24; 3(12):2-3. PubMed ID: 12345510
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions.
    Haas-Wilson D.
    J Policy Anal Manage; 1993 Jun 24; 12(3):498-511. PubMed ID: 10127357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.