These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
119 related items for PubMed ID: 1380916
1. Analysis of the coil generated impulse noise in extracranial magnetic stimulation. Counter SA, Borg E. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1992 Aug; 85(4):280-8. PubMed ID: 1380916 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Electromagnetic stimulation of the auditory system: effects and side-effects. Counter SA. Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993 Aug; 37():1-32. PubMed ID: 8210963 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Acoustic trauma in extracranial magnetic brain stimulation. Counter SA, Borg E, Lofqvist L. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1991 Mar; 78(3):173-84. PubMed ID: 1707789 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Oto-traumatic effects of computer simulated magnetic coil impulse noise: analysis of mechanisms. Counter SA, Borg E, Olofsson A. Acta Otolaryngol; 1993 Nov; 113(6):699-705. PubMed ID: 8291426 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Occluded insertion loss from intracochlear pressure measurements during acoustic shock wave exposure. Anderson DA, Argo TF, Greene NT. Hear Res; 2023 Feb; 428():108669. PubMed ID: 36565603 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Acoustic noise generated by TMS in typical environment and inside an MRI scanner. Nyrhinen MJ, Souza VH, Ilmoniemi RJ, Lin FH. Brain Stimul; 2024 Feb; 17(2):184-193. PubMed ID: 38342363 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of magnetic resonance imaging acoustic noise generated by a 4.7 T experimental system. Counter SA, Olofsson A, Borg E, Bjelke B, Häggström A, Grahn HF. Acta Otolaryngol; 2000 Sep; 120(6):739-43. PubMed ID: 11099151 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A measure of acoustic noise generated from transcranial magnetic stimulation coils. Dhamne SC, Kothare RS, Yu C, Hsieh TH, Anastasio EM, Oberman L, Pascual-Leone A, Rotenberg A. Brain Stimul; 2014 Sep; 7(3):432-4. PubMed ID: 24582370 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [The evaluation of usefullnes of hearing protectors while exposure to impulse noise]. Miłoński J, Olszewski J. Otolaryngol Pol; 2007 Sep; 61(5):877-9. PubMed ID: 18552039 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Temporary changes in hearing after exposure to shooting noise. Pawlaczyk-Luszczyńska M, Dudarewicz A, Bak M, Fiszer M, Kotyło P, Sliwińska-Kowalska M. Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2004 Sep; 17(2):285-93. PubMed ID: 15387085 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Isolating the auditory system from acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging: examination of noise conduction through the ear canal, head, and body. Ravicz ME, Melcher JR. J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jan; 109(1):216-31. PubMed ID: 11206150 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Impulse noise and risk criteria. Starck J, Toppila E, Pyykkö I. Noise Health; 2003 Jan; 5(20):63-73. PubMed ID: 14558894 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Physical characteristics of gunfire impulse noise and its attenuation by hearing protectors. Ylikoski M, Pekkarinen JO, Starck JP, Pääkkönen RJ, Ylikoski JS. Scand Audiol; 1995 Jan; 24(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 7761796 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Outer ear canal sound pressure and bone vibration measurement in SSD and CHL patients using a transcutaneous bone conduction instrument. Ghoncheh M, Lilli G, Lenarz T, Maier H. Hear Res; 2016 Oct; 340():161-168. PubMed ID: 26723102 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Noise in magnetic resonance imaging: no risk for sensorineural function but increased amplitude variability of otoacoustic emissions. Wagner W, Staud I, Frank G, Dammann F, Plontke S, Plinkert PK. Laryngoscope; 2003 Jul; 113(7):1216-23. PubMed ID: 12838022 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]