These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

216 related items for PubMed ID: 1391063

  • 1. Chlamydia trachomatis antigen detection by Chlamydiazyme combined with Chlamydia Blocking Reagent verification.
    Zeeberg B, Thelin I, Schalén C.
    Int J STD AIDS; 1992; 3(5):355-9. PubMed ID: 1391063
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Confirmatory testing demonstrates that false-positive rates in the chlamydiazyme assay are influenced by gender and genital specimen type.
    Chernesky M, Jang D, Sellors J, Castriciano S, Pickard L, Luinstra K, Mahony J.
    Sex Transm Dis; 1993; 20(6):301-6. PubMed ID: 8108751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of Pharmacia Chlamydia EIA for diagnosis of genital infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Chan SW.
    Pathology; 1993 Jan; 25(1):68-70. PubMed ID: 8316503
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A 1-year evaluation of Syva MicroTrak Chlamydia enzyme immunoassay with selective confirmation by direct fluorescent-antibody assay in a high-volume laboratory.
    Chan EL, Brandt K, Horsman GB.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Sep; 32(9):2208-11. PubMed ID: 7814548
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Value of confirmation of Chlamydiazyme enzyme immunoassay results in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Hallander H, Jonsson P, Gästrin B.
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1992 Jun; 11(6):550-2. PubMed ID: 1526241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of a commercial enzyme immunoassay versus culture for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Bäckman M, Rudén AK, Ringertz O, Sanström EG.
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1989 Sep; 8(9):778-82. PubMed ID: 2480238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen by enzyme immunoassay: importance of confirmatory testing.
    Fonseca K, Megran DW, Anand CM.
    J Clin Pathol; 1995 Mar; 48(3):214-7. PubMed ID: 7730479
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigens in first-void urine to identify asymptomatic male carriers.
    Genç M, Dutertre Y, Björk M, Mårdh PA.
    APMIS; 1992 Jul; 100(7):645-9. PubMed ID: 1642853
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effect of patient characteristics on performance of an enzyme immunoassay for detecting cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
    Magder LS, Klontz KC, Bush LH, Barnes RC.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Apr; 28(4):781-4. PubMed ID: 2185264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of three techniques for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens from asymptomatic women.
    Lefebvre J, Laperrière H, Rousseau H, Massé R.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Apr; 26(4):726-31. PubMed ID: 3284899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Study on Chlamydia trachomatis antigen detection by an EIA kit using a monoclonal antibody--comparison with a polyclonal EIA kit in urogenital infections].
    Hayashi K, Kumamoto Y, Tsukamoto T, Hirose T, Satoh T, Gohro T, Ikegaki S, Tatsuki J, Minami K, Yoshio H.
    Kansenshogaku Zasshi; 1991 Apr; 65(4):457-64. PubMed ID: 2071962
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.