These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


216 related items for PubMed ID: 1391063

  • 1. Chlamydia trachomatis antigen detection by Chlamydiazyme combined with Chlamydia Blocking Reagent verification.
    Zeeberg B, Thelin I, Schalén C.
    Int J STD AIDS; 1992; 3(5):355-9. PubMed ID: 1391063
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Confirmatory testing demonstrates that false-positive rates in the chlamydiazyme assay are influenced by gender and genital specimen type.
    Chernesky M, Jang D, Sellors J, Castriciano S, Pickard L, Luinstra K, Mahony J.
    Sex Transm Dis; 1993; 20(6):301-6. PubMed ID: 8108751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of Pharmacia Chlamydia EIA for diagnosis of genital infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Chan SW.
    Pathology; 1993 Jan; 25(1):68-70. PubMed ID: 8316503
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A 1-year evaluation of Syva MicroTrak Chlamydia enzyme immunoassay with selective confirmation by direct fluorescent-antibody assay in a high-volume laboratory.
    Chan EL, Brandt K, Horsman GB.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Sep; 32(9):2208-11. PubMed ID: 7814548
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Value of confirmation of Chlamydiazyme enzyme immunoassay results in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Hallander H, Jonsson P, Gästrin B.
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1992 Jun; 11(6):550-2. PubMed ID: 1526241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evaluation of Syva enzyme immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital specimens.
    Gaydos CA, Reichart CA, Long JM, Welsh LE, Neumann TM, Hook EW, Quinn TC.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Jul; 28(7):1541-4. PubMed ID: 2199517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Use of chlamydiazyme for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital infections.
    Monno R, De Vito D, Vena GA, Mosca A, Miragliotta G.
    Microbiologica; 1987 Oct; 10(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 3320688
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of a commercial enzyme immunoassay versus culture for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Bäckman M, Rudén AK, Ringertz O, Sanström EG.
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1989 Sep; 8(9):778-82. PubMed ID: 2480238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Use of PCR and direct immunofluorescence microscopy for confirmation of results obtained by Syva MicroTrak Chlamydia enzyme immunoassay.
    Ostergaard L, Møller JK.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Oct; 33(10):2620-3. PubMed ID: 8567894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of the Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay and Gen-Probe PACE 2 with cell culture for diagnosis of cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a high-prevalence female population.
    Clarke LM, Sierra MF, Daidone BJ, Lopez N, Covino JM, McCormack WM.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Apr; 31(4):968-71. PubMed ID: 7681852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of the Syva Microtrak enzyme immunoassay and Abbott Chlamydiazyme in the detection of chlamydial infections in women.
    Olsen MA, Sambol AR, Bohnert VA.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1995 Feb; 119(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 7848062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen by enzyme immunoassay: importance of confirmatory testing.
    Fonseca K, Megran DW, Anand CM.
    J Clin Pathol; 1995 Mar; 48(3):214-7. PubMed ID: 7730479
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Evaluation of verification assays in EIA specimens presumptively positive for Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Leonardi GP, Stavroulakis AM, Cruz J, Szabo K.
    J Med Microbiol; 1996 Feb; 44(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 8642577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigens in first-void urine to identify asymptomatic male carriers.
    Genç M, Dutertre Y, Björk M, Mårdh PA.
    APMIS; 1992 Jul; 100(7):645-9. PubMed ID: 1642853
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effect of patient characteristics on performance of an enzyme immunoassay for detecting cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
    Magder LS, Klontz KC, Bush LH, Barnes RC.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Apr; 28(4):781-4. PubMed ID: 2185264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of three techniques for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens from asymptomatic women.
    Lefebvre J, Laperrière H, Rousseau H, Massé R.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Apr; 26(4):726-31. PubMed ID: 3284899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine collected from men and women attending a venereal clinic.
    Genç M, Stary A, Bergman S, Mårdh PA.
    APMIS; 1991 May; 99(5):455-9. PubMed ID: 2043357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Confirmation of the Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay for chlamydia trachomatis by Syva Direct Fluorescent Antibody Test.
    Beebe JL, Masters H, Jungkind D, Heltzel DM, Weinberg A.
    Sex Transm Dis; 1996 May; 23(6):465-70. PubMed ID: 8946630
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Study on Chlamydia trachomatis antigen detection by an EIA kit using a monoclonal antibody--comparison with a polyclonal EIA kit in urogenital infections].
    Hayashi K, Kumamoto Y, Tsukamoto T, Hirose T, Satoh T, Gohro T, Ikegaki S, Tatsuki J, Minami K, Yoshio H.
    Kansenshogaku Zasshi; 1991 Apr; 65(4):457-64. PubMed ID: 2071962
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Enzyme immunoassay in the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in diverse patient groups.
    Bakir TM, Hossain A, De-Silva S, Siddiqui A, Sengupta BS, el-Sheikh MM, Bakir AF.
    J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol; 1989 Apr; 33(2):189-97. PubMed ID: 2671155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.