These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

232 related items for PubMed ID: 1397457

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The effects of restorative material and location on the detection of simulated recurrent caries. A comparison of dental film, direct digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography.
    Nair MK, Tyndall DA, Ludlow JB, May K, Ye F.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 9656871
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A comparison of the accuracy of digital and conventional radiography in the diagnosis of recurrent caries.
    Anbiaee N, Mohassel AR, Imanimoghaddam M, Moazzami SM.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Dec 01; 11(6):E025-32. PubMed ID: 21203734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Visibility of artificial buccal recurrent caries under restorations using different radiographic techniques.
    Murat S, Kamburoğlu K, Isayev A, Kurşun S, Yüksel S.
    Oper Dent; 2013 Dec 01; 38(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 22917443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Radiopacity of restorations and detection of secondary caries.
    Espelid I, Tveit AB, Erickson RL, Keck SC, Glasspoole EA.
    Dent Mater; 1991 Apr 01; 7(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 1936639
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Tuned aperture computed tomography and detection of recurrent caries.
    Nair MK, Tyndall DA, Ludlow JB, May K.
    Caries Res; 1998 Apr 01; 32(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 9438568
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Clinical validation of a new subtraction radiography technique for periodontal bone loss detection.
    Nummikoski PV, Steffensen B, Hamilton K, Dove SB.
    J Periodontol; 2000 Apr 01; 71(4):598-605. PubMed ID: 10807124
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Reproducibility in the assessment of caries lesion behaviour: a comparison between conventional film and subtraction radiography.
    Wenzel A, Anthonisen PN, Juul MB.
    Caries Res; 2000 Apr 01; 34(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 10867419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Detection of mineral loss in approximal enamel by subtraction radiography.
    Halse A, Espelid I, Tveit AB, White SC.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Feb 01; 77(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 8139837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.