These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
91 related items for PubMed ID: 140010
21. A clinical evaluation of the API microtube system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Brooks KA, Jens M, Sodeman TM. Am J Med Technol; 1974 Feb; 40(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 4591715 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Routine identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the "new improved Enterotube". Leers WD, Arthurs K. Can J Public Health; 1973 Apr; 64(6):584-7. PubMed ID: 4591012 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [The effect of resuscitation on the results obtained in identification of enterobacteriaceae by the API system (author's transl)]. de Blaauw LH, de Pijper FW. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd; 1977 Dec 01; 102(23):1376-9. PubMed ID: 337567 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Some problem and clinical evaluation on identification of organisms (author's transl)]. Sawatari K. Rinsho Byori; 1979 Dec 01; 27(2):112-20. PubMed ID: 372635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Clinical comparison of the enterotube II and API 20E systems for bacterial identification. Leighton PM, Little JA. Am J Clin Pathol; 1983 Mar 01; 79(3):367-70. PubMed ID: 6338701 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [Information on the automated COBAS-Bact system]. Antal M, Seckárová A, Krcméry V, Králíková K. Cesk Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol; 1986 Sep 01; 35(5):316-9. PubMed ID: 2944635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [A bacteriological study of 300 clinical specimens from patients suspected of having anaerobic infections (author's transl)]. Grossman G, Giglio M. Rev Med Chil; 1980 Jun 01; 108(6):527-36. PubMed ID: 7008126 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Comparative evaluation of 3 miniaturized systems (API 20E, Enterotube II, Sensititre AP60) commonly used in clinical microbiology laboratories]. Chiaradia V, Pistello M, Pascoli L, Tarabini Castellani G, Beduz R, Menin A, Santini G. Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1983 Jun 01; 19(2):159-75. PubMed ID: 6374735 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Usefulness of the diagnostic kit Enteroplast for identification of Enterobacteriaceae]. Zaremba M, Fiedoruk J, Borowski J. Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 1989 Jun 01; 41(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 2668658 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Comparative studies with the rapid KCN-test for Enterobacteriaceae according to Cahan, Sechter and Ohad (author's transl)]. Höhne C. Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A; 1976 Aug 01; 235(4):433-8. PubMed ID: 790855 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of Micro-ID, for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Izard D, Gavini F, Ochin D, Enayeh E, Leclerc H. Pathol Biol (Paris); 1980 Dec 01; 28(10):681-4. PubMed ID: 7008005 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [Evaluation of the rapid enterotube method for the identification of enterobacteria]. Nicoletti P. Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1974 Jun 01; 10(2):254-65. PubMed ID: 4617241 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The use of the R/B tubes in diagnostic bacteriology. James OB, Whitbourne FW, Hosang F, Grant LS. West Indian Med J; 1974 Mar 01; 23(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 4617422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. An evaluation of the Replireader in the identification of Enterobacteriaceae isolated from urine and in the recording of sensitivity tests performed by an agar dilution method. Waterworth PM. J Clin Pathol; 1980 Jun 01; 33(6):571-4. PubMed ID: 6995495 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]