These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
496 related items for PubMed ID: 1405658
41. Aortic and mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: mid-term clinical results. Meyns B, Szecsi J, Flameng W, Daenen W. J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Jan; 3(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 8162219 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Long-term performance of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis in the tricuspid position. A review of forty-five patients with fourteen-year follow-up. Guerra F, Bortolotti U, Thiene G, Milano A, Mazzucco A, Talenti E, Stellin G, Gallucci V. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1990 May; 99(5):838-45. PubMed ID: 2329821 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. The homograft aortic valve: a 29-year, 99.3% follow up of 1,022 valve replacements. O'Brien MF, Harrocks S, Stafford EG, Gardner MA, Pohlner PG, Tesar PJ, Stephens F. J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 May; 10(3):334-44; discussion 335. PubMed ID: 11380096 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Biological versus mechanical aortic prosthesis? A nineteen-year comparison in a propensity-matched population. Bottio T, Rizzoli G, Caprili L, Testolin L, Thiene G, Gerosa G. J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 16116876 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Five-year follow up of the ATS mechanical heart valve. Emery RW, Krogh CC, Jones DJ, Nicoloff DM, Blake DP, Arom KV. J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Mar; 13(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 15086262 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Clinical experience with the Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular porcine bioprosthesis implanted in the aortic position. Hurle A, Meseguer J, Llamas P, Casillas JA. J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 May; 7(3):331-5. PubMed ID: 9651848 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Carpentier-Edwards bioprosthesis: a 7-year follow-up in 361 patients. Zussa C, Del Ponte S, Ottino GM, Pansini S, Zattera G, Morea M. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Aug; 34(4):252-7. PubMed ID: 2429394 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Clinical outcomes with the epicholorohydrin-modified porcine aortic heart valve: a 15-year follow-up. Wei X, Yi W, Chen W, Ma X, Lau WB, Wang H, Yi D. Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 May; 89(5):1417-24. PubMed ID: 20417754 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. [Long-term results of isolated mitral valve replacement using bioprosthesis]. Yao H, Miyamoto T, Murata H. Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Jun; 41(6):969-74. PubMed ID: 8336048 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Is a bioprosthesis preferable in tricuspid valve replacement? Hayashi J, Saito A, Yamamoto K, Watanabe H, Ohzeki H, Eguchi S. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1996 Oct; 44(5):230-3. PubMed ID: 8948549 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. The last generation of pericardial valves in the aortic position: ten-year follow-up in 589 patients. Aupart MR, Sirinelli AL, Diemont FF, Meurisse YA, Dreyfus XB, Marchand MA. Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Feb; 61(2):615-20. PubMed ID: 8572776 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Four- to seven-year follow-up of patients undergoing Carpentier-Edwards porcine heart valve replacement. Gallo I, Artiñano E, Nistal F. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Dec; 33(6):347-51. PubMed ID: 2417370 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Very late outcomes for mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 25-year follow-up of 450 implantations. Bourguignon T, Bouquiaux-Stablo AL, Loardi C, Mirza A, Candolfi P, Marchand M, Aupart MR. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 148(5):2004-2011.e1. PubMed ID: 24667021 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis: clinical performance to seventeen years. Jamieson WR, Munro AI, Miyagishima RT, Allen P, Burr LH, Tyers GF. Ann Thorac Surg; 1995 Oct; 60(4):999-1006; discussion 1007. PubMed ID: 7575007 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Clinical experience with the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis: short-term results (from 2 to 4.5 years). Gallo I, Ruiz B, Duran CM. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1983 Oct; 31(5):277-81. PubMed ID: 6196860 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. A comparison of outcomes in men 11 years after heart-valve replacement with a mechanical valve or bioprosthesis. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study on Valvular Heart Disease. Hammermeister KE, Sethi GK, Henderson WG, Oprian C, Kim T, Rahimtoola S. N Engl J Med; 1993 May 06; 328(18):1289-96. PubMed ID: 8469251 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Valve replacement in children: early and late results. Rubino M, Stellin G, Mazzucco A, Bortolotti U, Rizzoli G, Faggian G, Daliento L, Milano A, Guerra F, Gallucci V. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Feb 06; 37(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 2922751 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Structural valve deterioration in mitral replacement surgery: comparison of Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular porcine and perimount pericardial bioprostheses. Eric Jamieson WR, Marchand MA, Pelletier CL, Norton R, Pellerin M, Dubiel TW, Aupart MR, Daenen WJ, Holden MP, David TE, Ryba EA, Anderson WN. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1999 Aug 06; 118(2):297-304. PubMed ID: 10425003 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Twelve-year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses. Bloomfield P, Wheatley DJ, Prescott RJ, Miller HC. N Engl J Med; 1991 Feb 28; 324(9):573-9. PubMed ID: 1992318 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]