These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

167 related items for PubMed ID: 14071873

  • 1. HEARING IN MICE VIA GSR AUDIOMETRY.
    BERLIN CI.
    J Speech Hear Res; 1963 Dec; 6():359-68. PubMed ID: 14071873
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Significance of problems of conditioning in GSR audiometry.
    HARDY WG, PAULS MD.
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1959 May; 24(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 13655280
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Hearing in mice by GSR audiometry. II. Magnitude of unconditioned GSR as a function of intensity and frequency interactions.
    Gill A, Berlin CI.
    J Speech Hear Res; 1968 Mar; 11(1):169-78. PubMed ID: 5648531
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The use of the galvanic skin response in the differential diagnosis of deafness.
    MICHELS MW.
    Perm Found Med Bull; 1950 Jul; 8(3):117-20. PubMed ID: 24537891
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Hearing in mice by GSR audiometry. I. Magnitude of unconditioned GSR as an index of frequency sensitivity.
    Berlin CI, Gill A, Leffler M.
    J Speech Hear Res; 1968 Mar; 11(1):159-68. PubMed ID: 5648530
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Importance of objective audiometry by study of the psychogalvanic reflex in the diagnosis of functional deafness in adults].
    MASPETIOL, GOUGEROT, KORINE.
    Ann Otolaryngol; 1951 Mar; 68(5-6):412-7. PubMed ID: 14885831
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. INSTRUMENTAL-AVOIDANCE CONDITIONING VERSUS CLASSICAL CONDITIONING IN ELECTRODERMAL AUDIOMETRY.
    SHEPHERD DC.
    J Speech Hear Res; 1964 Mar; 7():55-70. PubMed ID: 14130744
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. THE FAMILY PHYSICIAN AND THE PRESCHOOL HEARING-HANDICAPPED CHILD.
    SORTINI AJ.
    Can Med Assoc J; 1964 Sep 26; 91(13):704-7. PubMed ID: 14201264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Significance of audiometry in hearing tests in deafness and deaf mutism].
    ZINENBERG MS.
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1951 Sep 26; 13(5):22-7. PubMed ID: 14876939
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [RELATION AND VALUE OF VARIOUS HEARING TEST METHODS IN THE DETERMINATION OF QUANTITATIVE HEARING LOSS].
    SPANGENBERG F.
    Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1964 Nov 25; 183():298-306. PubMed ID: 14336715
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A PROGRAM OF MEDICAL MANAGEMENT FOR THE ADULT WITH SENSORI-NEURAL HEARING LOSS.
    BAILEY HA.
    Laryngoscope; 1964 Feb 25; 74():171-85. PubMed ID: 14117249
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [SUDDEN DEAFNESS. REPORT OF 4 CASES].
    SINZINGER G.
    HNO; 1964 Jul 25; 12():190-5. PubMed ID: 14250772
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Proposed new table for the calculation of the percentage of loss of hearing on the tonal audiogram based on research with acoustic filters].
    GIACCAI F, GARDENGHI G.
    Boll Mal Orecch Gola Naso; 1962 Jul 25; 80():119-39. PubMed ID: 13898260
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [DIAGNOSIS OF OCCUPATIONAL DEAFNESS].
    MOUNIER-KUHN P, LAFON JC, BONNEFOY J.
    Lyon Med; 1964 Nov 29; 212():1259-71. PubMed ID: 14236262
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.