These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

145 related items for PubMed ID: 1407884

  • 1. The prediction of "controlled" uterine rupture by the use of intrauterine pressure catheters.
    Devoe LD, Croom CS, Youssef AA, Murray C.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Oct; 80(4):626-9. PubMed ID: 1407884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Extramembranous placement of an air-coupled vs. transducer-tipped intrauterine pressure catheter.
    Sciscione AC, Duhl A, Pollock MA, Hoffman MK, Rhee A, Colmorgen GH.
    J Reprod Med; 2005 Aug; 50(8):578-84. PubMed ID: 16220762
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of two intrauterine pressure catheters during labor.
    Dowdle MA.
    J Reprod Med; 2003 Jul; 48(7):501-5. PubMed ID: 12953323
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Staircase sign: a newly described uterine contraction pattern seen in rupture of unscarred gravid uterus.
    Matsuo K, Scanlon JT, Atlas RO, Kopelman JN.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2008 Feb; 34(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 18226139
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evaluating a new intrauterine pressure catheter.
    Dowdle M.
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Aug; 42(8):506-13. PubMed ID: 9284013
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Intrauterine pressure catheter performance in an in vitro uterine model: a stimulation of problems for intrapartum monitoring.
    Devoe LD, Smith RP, Stoker R.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Aug; 82(2):285-9. PubMed ID: 8336879
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Previous preterm cesarean delivery: identification of a new risk factor for uterine rupture in VBAC candidates.
    Rochelson B, Pagano M, Conetta L, Goldman B, Vohra N, Frey M, Day C.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2005 Nov; 18(5):339-42. PubMed ID: 16390795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Artifactually elevated basal uterine tonus resulting from measurement of hydrostatic pressure by transducer-tipped intrauterine catheters.
    Ross MG, Walton J.
    J Perinatol; 1994 Nov; 14(5):408-10. PubMed ID: 7830158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Cervical ripening with transcervical foley catheter and the risk of uterine rupture.
    Bujold E, Blackwell SC, Gauthier RJ.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 103(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 14704239
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Reliability of intrauterine pressure measurements.
    Arulkumaran S, Yang M, Tien CY, Ratnam SS.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):800-2. PubMed ID: 1923200
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of stimulatory and inhibitory drugs on uterine electrical activity measured noninvasively from the abdominal surface of pregnant rats.
    Buhimschi CS, Saade GR, Buhimschi IA, Gokdeniz R, Boyle MB, Garfield RE.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jul; 183(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 10920311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Rupture of the uterine scar during term labour: contractility or biochemistry?
    Buhimschi CS, Buhimschi IA, Patel S, Malinow AM, Weiner CP.
    BJOG; 2005 Jan; 112(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 15663395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Risk factors of uterine rupture.
    Al-Jufairi ZA, Sandhu AK, Al-Durazi KA.
    Saudi Med J; 2001 Aug; 22(8):702-4. PubMed ID: 11573117
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Rupture of the scarred uterus.
    Grossetti E, Vardon D, Creveuil C, Herlicoviez M, Dreyfus M.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007 Aug; 86(5):572-8. PubMed ID: 17464586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Induction of labor: comparison of a cohort with uterine scar from previous cesarean section vs. a cohort with intact uterus.
    Locatelli A, Ghidini A, Ciriello E, Incerti M, Bonardi C, Regalia AL.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Aug; 19(8):471-5. PubMed ID: 16966111
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Monitoring intrauterine pressure during active labor. A prospective comparison of two methods.
    Devoe LD, Gardner P, Dear C, Searle N.
    J Reprod Med; 1989 Oct; 34(10):811-4. PubMed ID: 2795563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Single- versus double-layer uterine incision closure and uterine rupture.
    Gyamfi C, Juhasz G, Gyamfi P, Blumenfeld Y, Stone JL.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Oct; 19(10):639-43. PubMed ID: 17118738
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Monitoring contractions in obese parturients: electrohysterography compared with traditional monitoring.
    Euliano TY, Nguyen MT, Marossero D, Edwards RK.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 109(5):1136-40. PubMed ID: 17470595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Infectious morbidity, operative blood loss, and length of the operative procedure after cesarean delivery by method of placental removal and site of uterine repair.
    Magann EF, Washburne JF, Harris RL, Bass JD, Duff WP, Morrison JC.
    J Am Coll Surg; 1995 Dec; 181(6):517-20. PubMed ID: 7582225
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Augmentation of labor: does internal tocography result in better obstetric outcome than external tocography?
    Chua S, Kurup A, Arulkumaran S, Ratnam SS.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Aug; 76(2):164-7. PubMed ID: 2196493
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.