These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

227 related items for PubMed ID: 1410252

  • 21. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Lindemuth JS, Hagge MS, Broome JS.
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Influence of flowable composite lining thickness on Class II composite restorations.
    Chuang SF, Jin YT, Liu JK, Chang CH, Shieh DB.
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):301-8. PubMed ID: 15195731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M, Theodoridou-Pahini S, Papadogiannis Y, Karezis A.
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Dentin adhesive superior to copal varnish in preventing microleakage in primary teeth.
    Royse MC, Ott NW, Mathieu GP.
    Pediatr Dent; 1996; 18(7):440-3. PubMed ID: 8970205
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Survival of self-etch adhesive Class II composite restorations using ART and conventional cavity preparations in primary molars.
    Eden E, Topaloglu-Ak A, Frencken JE, van't Hof M.
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):359-63. PubMed ID: 17212078
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Class 5 composite resin restorations: margin configurations and the distance from the CEJ.
    Hall LH, Cochran MA, Swartz ML.
    Oper Dent; 1993 Dec; 18(6):246-50. PubMed ID: 8152997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Effect of grooves on resistance/retention form of Class 2 approximal slot amalgam restorations.
    Summitt JB, Osborne JW, Burgess JO.
    Oper Dent; 1993 Dec; 18(5):209-13. PubMed ID: 8152991
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Assessment of marginal leakage of class II amalgam-sealant restorations.
    Fuks AB, Grajover R, Eidelman E.
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1986 Dec; 53(5):343-5. PubMed ID: 3463579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Bonding of amalgam restorations: existing knowledge and future prospects.
    Setcos JC, Staninec M, Wilson NH.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Dec; 25(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 11203798
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. An in-vitro investigation of variables influencing mercury vapor release from dental amalgam.
    Neme AL, Maxson BB, Linger JB, Abbott LJ.
    Oper Dent; 2002 Dec; 27(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 11817472
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. A comparison of glass-ionomer cement and calcium hydroxide liners in amalgam restorations.
    Rabchinsky J, Donly KJ.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1993 Aug; 13(4):378-83. PubMed ID: 8300324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.