These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

227 related items for PubMed ID: 1410252

  • 41. The effect of amalgam bonding on resistance form of Class II amalgam restorations.
    Della Bona A, Summitt JB.
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Feb; 29(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 9643242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage.
    Marchiori S, Baratieri LN, de Andrada MA, Monteiro Júnior S, Ritter AV.
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Oct; 29(10):637-42. PubMed ID: 9922761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. Initial preparations for amalgam restorations: extending the longevity of the tooth-restoration unit.
    Summitt JB, Osborne JW.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1992 Nov; 123(11):67-73. PubMed ID: 1469207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. Increases in cavity volume associated with the removal of class 2 amalgam and composite restorations.
    Hunter AR, Treasure ET, Hunter AJ.
    Oper Dent; 1995 Nov; 20(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 8700763
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. Class II composite resin restorations with two polymerization techniques: relationship between microtensile bond strength and marginal leakage.
    Cenci M, Demarco F, de Carvalho R.
    J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):603-10. PubMed ID: 16005800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. Effectiveness of ART and traditional amalgam approach in restoring single-surface cavities in posterior teeth of permanent dentitions in school children after 6.3 years.
    Frencken JE, van't Hof MA, Taifour D, Al-Zaher I.
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 35(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 17518967
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. Fracture resistance of Class II approximal slot restorations.
    Yaman SD, Yetmez M, Türköz E, Akkas N.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 11005902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden.
    Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K, van Dijken JW, Funegård U, Lindberg A, Nilsson M.
    J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):673-8. PubMed ID: 19477572
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. The influence of modified cavity design and finishing techniques on the margin region of amalgam restorations: a simulated clinical study.
    Bryant RW.
    Aust Prosthodont J; 1992 Sep; 6():39-45. PubMed ID: 1300132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.