These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


60 related items for PubMed ID: 1411889

  • 21. [Preoperative needle biopsy: an improvement in palpable breast tumors with strong indications for malignancy].
    Zonderland HM, van de Velde CJ, van de Vijver MJ, Hermans J.
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1996 Sep 28; 140(39):1952-6. PubMed ID: 8927182
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of salivary gland lesions in a selected patient population.
    Cohen EG, Patel SG, Lin O, Boyle JO, Kraus DH, Singh B, Wong RJ, Shah JP, Shaha AR.
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Jun 28; 130(6):773-8. PubMed ID: 15210562
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Comparison of fine needle aspiration cytology and excisional biopsy in palpable breast cancers.
    Müslümanoğlu M, Dolay K, Ozmen V, Iğci A, Bozfakioğlu Y.
    Radiol Med; 1995 Mar 28; 89(3):225-8. PubMed ID: 7754112
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. A comparative analysis of core needle biopsy and fine-needle aspiration cytology in the evaluation of palpable and mammographically detected suspicious breast lesions.
    Garg S, Mohan H, Bal A, Attri AK, Kochhar S.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Nov 28; 35(11):681-9. PubMed ID: 17924407
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Evaluation of a palpable breast mass.
    Donegan WL.
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Sep 24; 327(13):937-42. PubMed ID: 1513351
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Triple approach in the diagnosis of dominant breast masses: combined physical examination, mammography, and fine-needle aspiration.
    Kaufman Z, Shpitz B, Shapiro M, Rona R, Lew S, Dinbar A.
    J Surg Oncol; 1994 Aug 24; 56(4):254-7. PubMed ID: 8057655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. [Diagnostic and therapeutic management of breast cysts].
    Geier G, Schlag P, Schuhmann RA.
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1982 Jul 24; 42(7):510-2. PubMed ID: 6922069
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. The diagnostic accuracy of palpation and fine-needle biopsy and an evaluation of their combined use in the diagnosis of breast lesions: report on a prospective study in 1244 women with symptoms.
    Rimsten A, Stenkvist B, Johanson H, Lindgren A.
    Ann Surg; 1975 Jul 24; 182(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 1170819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Prospective evaluation of the value of negative sonographic and mammographic findings in patients with palpable abnormalities of the breast.
    Shetty MK, Shah YP.
    J Ultrasound Med; 2002 Nov 24; 21(11):1211-6; quiz 1217-9. PubMed ID: 12418762
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Imaging management of palpable breast abnormalities.
    Lehman CD, Lee AY, Lee CI.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Nov 24; 203(5):1142-53. PubMed ID: 25341156
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Diagnosis of palpable breast lesions in younger women by the modified triple test is accurate and cost-effective.
    Vetto JT, Pommier RF, Schmidt WA, Eppich H, Alexander PW.
    Arch Surg; 1996 Sep 24; 131(9):967-72; discussion 972-4. PubMed ID: 8790167
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Evaluation and management of breast abnormalities.
    Winchester DP.
    Cancer; 1990 Sep 15; 66(6 Suppl):1345-7. PubMed ID: 2205363
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Benign breast disorders.
    Onstad M, Stuckey A.
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2013 Sep 15; 40(3):459-73. PubMed ID: 24021252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. [Tuberculosis of the breast].
    Zhivetskiĭ AV.
    Vestn Khir Im I I Grek; 1979 May 15; 122(5):56-8. PubMed ID: 452273
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Breast masses. In-office evaluation with diagnostic triad.
    Hindle WH.
    Postgrad Med; 1990 Aug 15; 88(2):85-7, 90-4. PubMed ID: 2381886
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Prospective evaluation of physical examination of the breast.
    Boyd NF, Sutherland HJ, Fish EB, Hiraki GY, Lickley HL, Maurer VE.
    Am J Surg; 1981 Sep 15; 142(3):331-4. PubMed ID: 7283021
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Palpable breast lumps: An age-based approach to evaluation and diagnosis.
    Malherbe F, Nel D, Molabe H, Cairncross L, Roodt L.
    S Afr Fam Pract (2004); 2022 Sep 23; 64(1):e1-e5. PubMed ID: 36226953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Clinically palpable breast abnormalities with normal imaging: is clinically guided biopsy still required?
    Gumus H, Gumus M, Mills P, Fish D, Devalia H, Jones SE, Jones PA, Sever AR.
    Clin Radiol; 2012 May 23; 67(5):437-40. PubMed ID: 22119297
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Role of triple test score in the evaluation of palpable breast lump.
    Kachewar SS, Dongre SD.
    Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol; 2015 May 23; 36(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 26157290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Palpable abnormalities of the breast not requiring excisional biopsy.
    Somers RG, Sandler GL, Kaplan MJ, Najjar D, Anderson AV, Cohen MH.
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1992 Oct 23; 175(4):325-8. PubMed ID: 1411889
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 3.