These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


340 related items for PubMed ID: 14192720

  • 21. LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS OF EARLY MALIGNANT DISEASE. NEW DIAGNOSTIC TESTS FOR CANCER OF THE UTERUS.
    BONHAM DG.
    Trans Med Soc Lond; 1964; 80():30-41. PubMed ID: 14270933
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE SUSPICIOUS VAGINAL SMEAR.
    BACHUS NE, LEE JH.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1964 Jan; 23():80-4. PubMed ID: 14110066
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. [VAGINAL AND CERVICAL CYTOLOGY. COMPARISON BETWEEN CYTOLOGICAL FINDINGS AND BIOPSY FINDINGS].
    SJOLIN KE, HORNBAK H.
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1964 Apr 16; 126():546-8. PubMed ID: 14146594
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. CERVICAL CARCINOMA: CYTOLOGIC STUDIES CORRELATED WITH GROWTH AND PROGNOSIS.
    DIDDLE AW, WILLIAMSON PJ.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1964 Aug 15; 89():975-83. PubMed ID: 14204793
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF CERVICAL DYSKARYOSIS.
    WILLIAMSON HO, HESTER LL, PRATT-THOMAS HR, MCIVER FA, CLARK A.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1964 Apr 15; 88():1029-38. PubMed ID: 14139284
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Atypical or suspicious cervical smears. An aggressive diagnostic approach.
    Nyirjesy I.
    JAMA; 1972 Nov 06; 222(6):691-3. PubMed ID: 4677898
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. COMPARISON OF THE PATHOLOGY OF CERVICAL CANCER IN CONNECTICUT AND THE SOUTHWEST REGION OF ENGLAND.
    THOMAS LB, BAILAR JC, THOMSON AD.
    Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1964 Oct 06; 15():83-92. PubMed ID: 14248029
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. [ON THE MORPHOLOGY AND PROGNOSIS OF "QUESTIONABLE" CYTOLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS].
    WAGNER D, RUEPPELL V.
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1964 Nov 07; 86():1577-96. PubMed ID: 14324053
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. [APROPOS OF A CASE OF "UTERINE ICHTHYOSIS": INTRAEPITHELIAL PROPAGATION OF AN "INVASIVE" CARCINOMA OF CERVICO-ISTHMIC ORIGIN].
    BROCHERIOU C, PINAUDEAU Y.
    Arch Anat Pathol (Paris); 1963 Dec 07; 11():259-61. PubMed ID: 14113788
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. [INTRA-EPITHELIAL CANCER OF THE UTERINE CERVIX; DETECTION AND TREATMENT].
    LANGERON P, GAUDEFROY M.
    J Sci Med Lille; 1963 Oct 07; 81():460-82. PubMed ID: 14092887
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. POSTPARTUM CARE OF THE CERVIX.
    PFUETZE RE.
    J Kans Med Soc; 1964 Aug 07; 65():380-3. PubMed ID: 14183411
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.