These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

198 related items for PubMed ID: 14203983

  • 1. [RESPECTIVE INDICATIONS OF VENTOUSE AND FORCEPS].
    MAHON R, BAROUK L.
    Maternite; 1964 Jun; 13():178-89. PubMed ID: 14203983
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [DELIVERY BY OBSTETRICAL VENTOUSE IN SAIGON. ITS PLACE BESIDE FORCEPS AND CESAREAN SECTION].
    GOURILLON H.
    Med Trop (Mars); 1964 Jun; 24():71-6. PubMed ID: 14142044
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [FORCEPS IN CURRENT OBSTETRICAL PRACTICE. ANALYSIS OF 342 CASES].
    SALVATORE CA, PINOTTI JA, OHELING R.
    Rev Ginecol Obstet (Sao Paulo); 1965 Mar; 116():136-46. PubMed ID: 14331843
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. THE VACUUM-EXTRACTOR. II. VALUE IN RELATION TO FORCEPS AND RANGE OF INDICATIONS.
    Lang P.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1964 Mar; 43(S1):57-85. PubMed ID: 14150609
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Vacuum or forceps extraction?].
    MANASSE JP.
    Sem Med; 1962 Sep 27; 121():1297-301. PubMed ID: 13932696
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Ventouse or forceps?
    Johanson RB.
    Br J Hosp Med; 1991 Jul 27; 46(1):13. PubMed ID: 1868299
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY IN NEWBORN INFANTS AFTER NORMAL DELIVERY AND AFTER FORCEPS AND VACUUM EXTRACTION].
    CACAVA KV.
    Cesk Gynekol; 1964 Dec 27; 43():725-30. PubMed ID: 14250686
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A comparative clinical study of the vacuum extractor and forceps. I. Preliminary observations.
    NYIRJESY I, HAWKS BL, FALLS HC, MUNSAT TL, PIERCE WE.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1963 Apr 15; 85():1071-82. PubMed ID: 13939310
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Comparative measurements on intracranial pressure following the use of the forceps and vacuum extractor].
    BREHM H.
    Arch Gynakol; 1963 Apr 15; 198():579-83. PubMed ID: 14015183
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [MALMSTROEM'S VENTOUSE IN OBSTETRIC PRACTICE. CLINICO-STATISTICAL CONTRIBUTION].
    MEO R, GIANELLI A.
    Arch Ostet Ginecol; 1964 Apr 15; 69():395-407. PubMed ID: 14253202
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [THE CHANGE IN OBSTETRICAL SURGERY DURING THE LAST 30 YEARS (EXEMPLIFIED BY PROCEDURES IN HAMBURG)].
    DIETEL H, KEDING G.
    Med Welt; 1964 Aug 08; 32():1679-88. PubMed ID: 14291143
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Forceps and ventouse. Frequency, indications and complications related to their use. Clinico-statistical contribution].
    Borin B, Burigo D.
    Minerva Ginecol; 1986 Apr 08; 38(4):321-4. PubMed ID: 3725174
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [7 years of forceps and vacuum extractor].
    HACKL H.
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1963 Jan 18; 75():43-6. PubMed ID: 13951691
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.