These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Validation by serial standardized testing of a new rate-responsive pacemaker sensor based on variations in myocardial contractility. Clémenty J, Kobeissi A, Garrigue S, Jaïs P, Le Métayer P, Haïssaguerre M. Europace; 2001 Apr; 3(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 11333049 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Analysis of myocardial evoked potentials in relation to ergometric load and heart rate for use in frequency-adaptive cardiac pacemakers]. Wetzig T, Fischer G, Worth H, Hardt R, Hubmann M, Bolz A, Schaldach M. Biomed Tech (Berl); 1995 Apr; 40(1-2):9-13. PubMed ID: 7703348 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Behavior of various activity-controlled cardiac pacemakers in treadmill stress tests with variable slopes]. Matula M, Hölzer K, Zitzmann E, Schön H, Alt E. Z Kardiol; 1993 Feb; 82(2):108-15. PubMed ID: 8465563 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Effect of body posture on heart rate and cardiocirculatory parameters in stress--implications for frequency-adapted pacemaker systems]. Bestler M, Alt E, Montoya P, Schandry R. Z Kardiol; 1992 Jan; 81(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 1570725 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Which programmable functions of pacemakers are available, and what is their clinical relevance?]. Jung W, Manz M, Lüderitz B. Herz; 1991 Jun; 16(3):158-70. PubMed ID: 1889791 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Hemodynamics and exercise capacity during pacemaker stimulation. Nordlander R, Hedman A. Herz; 1991 Jun; 16(3):149-57. PubMed ID: 1889790 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Adaptive-rate pacemakers. Comparison of sensors and clinical experience. Katritsis D, Camm AJ. Cardiol Clin; 1992 Nov; 10(4):671-90. PubMed ID: 1423380 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Analysis of ventricular evoked action potential for the detection of chronotropic status]. Potschadtke J, Dauer W, Bolz A, Schaldach M. Biomed Tech (Berl); 1997 Nov; 42 Suppl():135-6. PubMed ID: 9517083 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Direct comparison of a contractility and activity pacemaker sensor during treadmill exercise testing. Erol-Yilmaz A, Tukkie R, De Boo J, Schrama T, Wilde A. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Nov; 27(11):1493-9. PubMed ID: 15546303 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Importance of heart rate during exercise for response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Maass AH, Buck S, Nieuwland W, Brügemann J, van Veldhuisen DJ, Van Gelder IC. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2009 Jul; 20(7):773-80. PubMed ID: 19207785 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A blended sensor restores chronotropic response more favorably than an accelerometer alone in pacemaker patients: the LIFE study results. Coman J, Freedman R, Koplan BA, Reeves R, Santucci P, Stolen KQ, Kraus SM, Meyer TE, LIFE Study Results. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 Nov; 31(11):1433-42. PubMed ID: 18950301 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Timing cycles of permanent pacemakers. Hayes DL. Cardiol Clin; 1992 Nov; 10(4):593-608. PubMed ID: 1423375 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Chronotropic incompetence as a predictor of death among patients with normal electrograms taking beta blockers (metoprolol or atenolol). Khan MN, Pothier CE, Lauer MS. Am J Cardiol; 2005 Nov 01; 96(9):1328-33. PubMed ID: 16253608 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]