These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Tunnel restorations: a long-term pilot study over a minimum of five years. Lumley PJ, Fisher FJ. J Dent; 1995 Aug; 23(4):213-5. PubMed ID: 7629325 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative study of plaque mutans streptococci levels in children receiving glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations. Ertuğrul F, Eltem R, Eronat C. J Dent Child (Chic); 2003 Aug; 70(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 12762601 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Tunnel restorations in permanent teeth. A 7 year follow up study. Hasselrot L. Swed Dent J; 1998 Aug; 22(1-2):1-7. PubMed ID: 9646387 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Six-year success rates of occlusal amalgam and glass-ionomer restorations placed using three minimal intervention approaches. Mandari GJ, Frencken JE, van't Hof MA. Caries Res; 2003 Aug; 37(4):246-53. PubMed ID: 12771499 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer (polyalkenoate) and silver amalgam restorations in the treatment of Class 5 caries in xerostomic head and neck cancer patients. Wood RE, Maxymiw WG, McComb D. Oper Dent; 1993 Aug; 18(3):94-102. PubMed ID: 8415169 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Secondary caries formation in vitro around fluoride-releasing restorations. Dionysopoulos P, Kotsanos N, Koliniotou-Koubia, Papagodiannis Y. Oper Dent; 1994 Aug; 19(5):183-8. PubMed ID: 8700758 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Three restorative materials and topical fluoride gel used in xerostomic patients: a clinical comparison. Haveman CW, Summitt JB, Burgess JO, Carlson K. J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Feb; 134(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 12636121 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A pilot study of the marginal adaptation and surface morphology of glass-cermet cements. Chu CH, King NM, Lee AM, Yiu CK, Wei SH. Quintessence Int; 1996 Jul; 27(7):493-501. PubMed ID: 8941827 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations. Donly KJ, Segura A, Kanellis M, Erickson RL. J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Oct; 130(10):1459-66. PubMed ID: 10570589 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer cement and amalgam in class two restorations by Streptococcus mutans count analysis at fixed intervals: an in vivo study. Tegginmani VS, Goel B, Uppin V, Horatti P, Kumar LS, Nainani A. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May 01; 14(3):381-6. PubMed ID: 24171977 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]