These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


229 related items for PubMed ID: 1428846

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Twenty years after. The legacy of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. The dangers of difference.
    King PA.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(6):35-8. PubMed ID: 1428847
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Twenty years after. The legacy of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. When evil intrudes.
    Caplan AL.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(6):29-32. PubMed ID: 1428845
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Survivors of Tuskegee study get apology from Clinton.
    Mitchell A.
    N Y Times Web; 1997 May 17; ():10. PubMed ID: 11647214
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The Tuskegee syphilis experiment: medical ethics, constitutionalism, and property in the body.
    Roy B.
    Harv J Minor Public Health; 1995 May 17; 1(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 11656513
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Racism and research: the case of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study.
    Brandt AM.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1978 Dec 17; 8(6):21-9. PubMed ID: 721302
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Clinton to express regret for experiment on blacks.
    Stout D.
    N Y Times Web; 1997 Apr 09; ():B8. PubMed ID: 11647209
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Fetal experimentation: legal implications of an ethical conundrum.
    Wilson JP.
    Denver Law J; 1976 Apr 09; 53(4):581-642. PubMed ID: 11664590
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The legacy of the Tuskegee syphilis experiments for emergency exception from informed consent.
    Schmidt TA.
    Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Jan 09; 41(1):79-81. PubMed ID: 12514686
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. An overview of legal controls on human experimentation and the regulatory implications of taking Professor Katz seriously.
    Goldner JA.
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1993 Jan 09; 38(1):63-134. PubMed ID: 11656325
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Steps still being taken to undo damage of "America's Nuremberg".
    Wolinsky H.
    Ann Intern Med; 1997 Aug 15; 127(4):I43-4. PubMed ID: 9454520
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment: biotechnology and the administrative state.
    Roy B.
    J Natl Med Assoc; 1995 Jan 15; 87(1):56-67. PubMed ID: 7869408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. "Tuskegee revisited" revisited.
    Benedek TG.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2002 Jan 15; 32(2):4; author reply 4-5. PubMed ID: 11998773
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Historical Origins of the Tuskegee Experiment: The Dilemma of Public Health in the United States.
    Park J.
    Uisahak; 2017 Dec 15; 26(3):545-578. PubMed ID: 29311536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.