These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

178 related items for PubMed ID: 1436619

  • 1. [Sampling devices for the Papanicolaou test].
    Broso P, Buffetti G, Sacco A.
    Minerva Ginecol; 1992 Sep; 44(9):441-7. PubMed ID: 1436619
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling.
    Rammou-Kinia R, Anagnostopoulou I, Gomousa M.
    Acta Cytol; 1991 Sep; 35(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 1994638
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Controlled evaluation of implementing the Cytobrush technique to improve Papanicolaou smear quality.
    Murata PJ, Johnson RA, McNicoll KE.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Apr; 75(4):690-5. PubMed ID: 2314788
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The efficacy of an endocervical brush in obtaining adequate Papanicolaou smears.
    Grossman MB, Clofine R.
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1991 Sep; 91(9):875-9. PubMed ID: 1757278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of Cytobrush sampling, spatula sampling and combined Cytobrush-spatula sampling of the uterine cervix.
    Buntinx F, Boon ME, Beck S, Knottnerus JA, Essed GG.
    Acta Cytol; 1991 Sep; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 1994637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The Cytobrush effect on Pap smear adequacy.
    Davey-Sullivan B, Gearhart J, Evers CG, Cason Z, Replogle WH.
    Fam Pract Res J; 1991 Mar; 11(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 2028815
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Consequences of the introduction of combined spatula and Cytobrush sampling for cervical cytology. Improvements in smear quality and detection rates.
    Boon ME, Alons-van Kordelaar JJ, Rietveld-Scheffers PE.
    Acta Cytol; 1986 Mar; 30(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 3521176
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A randomized clinical trial comparing the Cytobrush and cotton swab for Papanicolaou smears.
    Koonings PP, Dickinson K, d'Ablaing G, Schlaerth JB.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug; 80(2):241-5. PubMed ID: 1635737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Papanicolaou smear adequacy: the effect of the sampling sequence.
    Noel ML, Kazal LA, Glenday MC.
    J Am Board Fam Pract; 1993 Aug; 6(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 8452061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. An evaluation of cytologic sampling techniques. A comparative study.
    Garite TJ, Feldman MJ.
    Acta Cytol; 1978 Aug; 22(2):83-5. PubMed ID: 276236
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Improved endocervical sampling with the Cytobrush.
    Chalvardjian A, De Marchi WG, Bell V, Nishikawa R.
    CMAJ; 1991 Feb 01; 144(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 1989710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Analysis of five sampling methods for the preparation of cervical smears.
    Boon ME, de Graaff Guilloud JC, Rietveld WJ.
    Acta Cytol; 1989 Feb 01; 33(6):843-8. PubMed ID: 2588917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Papanicolaou smear adequacy: the cervical cytobrush and Ayre spatula compared with the extended-tip spatula.
    Noel ML.
    J Am Board Fam Pract; 1989 Feb 01; 2(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 2665423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Cytological screening--the technique of cytological specimen taking and its influence on the quality of the method].
    Ivanov S.
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2007 Feb 01; 46(8):26-7. PubMed ID: 18642552
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Efficacy of the cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells.
    Kristensen GB, Hølund B, Grinsted P.
    Acta Cytol; 1989 Feb 01; 33(6):849-51. PubMed ID: 2588918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Common problems in Papanicolaou smear interpretation.
    DeMay RM.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar 01; 121(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 9111106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Paired cervical smears: a method of reducing the false-negative rate in population screening.
    Beilby JO, Bourne R, Guillebaud J, Steele ST.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Jul 01; 60(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 7088450
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Cervex-Brush and Cytobrush. Comparison of their ability to sample abnormal cells for cervical smears.
    Hutchinson M, Fertitta L, Goldbaum B, Hamza M, Vanerian S, Isenstein L.
    J Reprod Med; 1991 Aug 01; 36(8):581-6. PubMed ID: 1941800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Endocervical detection of CIN. Cytobrush versus cotton.
    Schettino F, Sideri M, Cangini L, Candiani M, Zannoni E, Maggi R, Ferrari A.
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1993 Aug 01; 14(3):234-6. PubMed ID: 8508881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The effectiveness and safety of two cervical cytologic techniques during pregnancy.
    Stillson T, Knight AL, Elswick RK.
    J Fam Pract; 1997 Aug 01; 45(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 9267375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.