These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

158 related items for PubMed ID: 1439472

  • 1. [Evaluation of the method of delivery in breech presentation].
    Rachdi R, Mouelhi C, Fekih MA, Hajjami R, Brahim H.
    Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1992; 87(7-9):415-8. PubMed ID: 1439472
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Breech presentations in 1957-1961 and 1967-1975 at the Landesfrauenklinik Magdeburg].
    Prügel P, Link M.
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1977; 99(25):1572-5. PubMed ID: 610240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of vaginal and cesarean section delivery for fetuses in breech presentation.
    Ismail MA, Nagib N, Ismail T, Cibils LA.
    J Perinat Med; 1999; 27(5):339-51. PubMed ID: 10642954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Management of the selected term breech presentation: assessment of the risks of selected vaginal delivery versus cesarean section for all cases.
    Bingham P, Lilford RJ.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Jun; 69(6):965-78. PubMed ID: 3554070
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Neonatal performance of the selected term vaginal breech delivery.
    Gimovsky ML, Petrie RH, Todd WD.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Dec; 56(6):687-91. PubMed ID: 7443110
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Dillema about the method of delivery for the fetus in breech presentation].
    Vasilj O, Matijević R, Grgić O.
    Acta Med Croatica; 2007 Apr; 61(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 17585474
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Results of mostly vaginal deliveries of breech presentation].
    Hofmann D, Carle-Grewe G.
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1990 Apr; 112(24):1525-40. PubMed ID: 2072979
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The impact of route of delivery and presentation on twin neonatal and infant mortality: a population-based study in the USA, 1995-97.
    Kontopoulos EV, Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Vintzileos AM.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Apr; 15(4):219-24. PubMed ID: 15280128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Vaginal vs. cesarean delivery for preterm breech presentation of singleton infants in California: a population-based study.
    Robilio PA, Boe NM, Danielsen B, Gilbert WM.
    J Reprod Med; 2007 Jun; 52(6):473-9. PubMed ID: 17694963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Breech presentation.
    Eller DP, VanDorsten JP.
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 5(5):664-8. PubMed ID: 8241444
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [More moderate neonatal morbidity in the case of non-randomized vaginal delivery of term breech pregnancies].
    Reijners EP, Roumen FJ.
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Aug 11; 145(32):1558-61. PubMed ID: 11525091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.