These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

130 related items for PubMed ID: 1442484

  • 1. Edge detection versus densitometry in the quantitative assessment of stenosis phantoms: an in vivo comparison in porcine coronary arteries.
    Di Mario C, Haase J, den Boer A, Reiber JH, Serruys PW.
    Am Heart J; 1992 Nov; 124(5):1181-9. PubMed ID: 1442484
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Can the same edge-detection algorithm be applied to on-line and off-line analysis systems? Validation of a new cinefilm-based geometric coronary measurement software.
    Haase J, van der Linden MM, Di Mario C, van der Giessen WJ, Foley DP, Serruys PW.
    Am Heart J; 1993 Aug; 126(2):312-21. PubMed ID: 8338000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. In-vivo validation of videodensitometric coronary cross-sectional area measurement using dual-energy digital subtraction angiography.
    Molloi S, Ersahin A, Hicks J, Wallis J.
    Int J Card Imaging; 1995 Dec; 11(4):223-31. PubMed ID: 8596060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Quantitative coronary angiography using image recovery techniques for background estimation in unsubtracted images.
    Wong JT, Kamyar F, Molloi S.
    Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):4003-15. PubMed ID: 17985646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. In-vivo validation of on-line and off-line geometric coronary measurements using insertion of stenosis phantoms in porcine coronary arteries.
    Haase J, Di Mario C, Slager CJ, van der Giessen WJ, den Boer A, de Feyter PJ, Reiber JH, Verdouw PD, Serruys PW.
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1992 Sep; 27(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 1525805
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Automated quantitative coronary arteriography: morphologic and physiologic validation in vivo of a rapid digital angiographic method.
    Mancini GB, Simon SB, McGillem MJ, LeFree MT, Friedman HZ, Vogel RA.
    Circulation; 1987 Feb; 75(2):452-60. PubMed ID: 3802448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Relative insensitivity of densitometric stenosis measurement to lumen edge determination.
    Herrold EM, Goldberg HL, Borer JS, Wong K, Moses JW.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1990 Jun; 15(7):1570-7. PubMed ID: 2188988
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Videodensitometry versus digital calipers for quantitative coronary angiography.
    Theron HD, Lambert CR, Pepine CJ.
    Am J Cardiol; 1990 Nov 15; 66(17):1186-90. PubMed ID: 2239720
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Limitation of detection and evaluation of coronary arterial stenosis by densitometry.
    Sugahara T, Kimura K, Yanagihara Y, Sugimoto N, Azumi T.
    Int J Card Imaging; 1994 Mar 15; 10(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 8021529
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.