These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

153 related items for PubMed ID: 1451523

  • 1. Study to determine the correlation between condom breakage in human use and laboratory test results.
    Steiner M, Foldesy R, Cole D, Carter E.
    Contraception; 1992 Sep; 46(3):279-88. PubMed ID: 1451523
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of condom breakage during human use with performance in laboratory testing.
    Russell-Brown P, Piedrahita C, Foldesy R, Steiner M, Townsend J.
    Contraception; 1992 May; 45(5):429-37. PubMed ID: 1623715
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Latex condom breakage and slippage in a controlled clinical trial.
    Rosenberg MJ, Waugh MS.
    Contraception; 1997 Jul; 56(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 9306027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Condom performance during vaginal intercourse: comparison of Trojan-Enz and Tactylon condoms.
    Trussell J, Warner DL, Hatcher R.
    Contraception; 1992 Jan; 45(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 1591918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Viral leakage risk differences in latex condoms.
    Voeller B, Nelson J, Day C.
    AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses; 1994 Jun; 10(6):701-10. PubMed ID: 8074934
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Implications of laboratory tests of condom integrity.
    Carey RF, Lytle CD, Cyr WH.
    Sex Transm Dis; 1999 Apr; 26(4):216-20. PubMed ID: 10225589
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Mechanical failure of the latex condom in a cohort of women at high STD risk.
    Macaluso M, Kelaghan J, Artz L, Austin H, Fleenor M, Hook EW, Valappil T.
    Sex Transm Dis; 1999 Sep; 26(8):450-8. PubMed ID: 10494936
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Optical testing of condoms.
    Smith SR, Lowrance JL, Tessarotto LA.
    Contraception; 1999 Jan; 59(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 10342085
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Altered surface character of stretched condom latex.
    Jay GD, Drummond E, Lane B.
    Contraception; 1992 Feb; 45(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 1559333
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Breakage and slippage of condoms in family planning clients.
    Sparrow MJ, Lavill K.
    Contraception; 1994 Aug; 50(2):117-29. PubMed ID: 7956211
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of the efficacy of a polyurethane condom: results from a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Frezieres RG, Walsh TL, Nelson AL, Clark VA, Coulson AH.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1999 Aug; 31(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 10224546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The real problem with male condoms is nonuse.
    Steiner MJ, Cates W, Warner L.
    Sex Transm Dis; 1999 Sep; 26(8):459-62. PubMed ID: 10494937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Condom breakage during commercial sex in Chiang Mai, Thailand.
    Rugpao S, Pruithithada N, Yutabootr Y, Prasertwitayakij W, Tovanabutra S.
    Contraception; 1993 Dec; 48(6):537-47. PubMed ID: 8131395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Can condom users likely to experience condom failure be identified?
    Steiner M, Piedrahita C, Glover L, Joanis C.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1993 Dec; 25(5):220-3, 226. PubMed ID: 8262171
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Interaction of condom design and user techniques and condom acceptability.
    Gerofi J, Deniaud F, Friel P.
    Contraception; 1995 Oct; 52(4):223-8. PubMed ID: 8605780
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.