These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

160 related items for PubMed ID: 1452648

  • 1. Evaluation of three immunoassays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from asymptomatic males.
    Leonardi GP, Seitz M, Edstrom R, Cruz J, Costello P, Szabo K.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Nov; 30(11):2793-6. PubMed ID: 1452648
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Use of PCR and direct immunofluorescence microscopy for confirmation of results obtained by Syva MicroTrak Chlamydia enzyme immunoassay.
    Ostergaard L, Møller JK.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Oct; 33(10):2620-3. PubMed ID: 8567894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigens in first-void urine to identify asymptomatic male carriers.
    Genç M, Dutertre Y, Björk M, Mårdh PA.
    APMIS; 1992 Jul; 100(7):645-9. PubMed ID: 1642853
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Evaluation of the Biostar Chlamydia OIA assay with specimens from women attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic.
    Pate MS, Dixon PB, Hardy K, Crosby M, Hook EW.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Aug; 36(8):2183-6. PubMed ID: 9665987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of the Syva Microtrak enzyme immunoassay and Abbott Chlamydiazyme in the detection of chlamydial infections in women.
    Olsen MA, Sambol AR, Bohnert VA.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1995 Feb; 119(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 7848062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in first catch urine samples from symptomatic and asymptomatic males.
    Moncada J, Schachter J, Shafer MA, Williams E, Gourlay L, Lavin B, Bolan G.
    Sex Transm Dis; 1994 Feb; 21(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 8140494
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A 1-year evaluation of Syva MicroTrak Chlamydia enzyme immunoassay with selective confirmation by direct fluorescent-antibody assay in a high-volume laboratory.
    Chan EL, Brandt K, Horsman GB.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Sep; 32(9):2208-11. PubMed ID: 7814548
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assays in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis: how valid are they?
    Weismeier E, Bruckner DA, Malotte CK, Manduke L.
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1988 Apr; 9(4):219-23. PubMed ID: 3180707
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of three techniques for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens from asymptomatic women.
    Lefebvre J, Laperrière H, Rousseau H, Massé R.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Apr; 26(4):726-31. PubMed ID: 3284899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of urine-based screening strategies to detect Chlamydia trachomatis among sexually active asymptomatic young males.
    Shafer MA, Schachter J, Moncada J, Keogh J, Pantell R, Gourlay L, Eyre S, Boyer CB.
    JAMA; 1993 Nov 03; 270(17):2065-70. PubMed ID: 8411573
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Head-to-head evaluation of five chlamydia tests relative to a quality-assured culture standard.
    Newhall WJ, Johnson RE, DeLisle S, Fine D, Hadgu A, Matsuda B, Osmond D, Campbell J, Stamm WE.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Mar 03; 37(3):681-5. PubMed ID: 9986831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine of asymptomatic men.
    Sanders JW, Hook EW, Welsh LE, Shepherd ME, Quinn TC.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Jan 03; 32(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 8126190
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of the Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay and Gen-Probe PACE 2 with cell culture for diagnosis of cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a high-prevalence female population.
    Clarke LM, Sierra MF, Daidone BJ, Lopez N, Covino JM, McCormack WM.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Apr 03; 31(4):968-71. PubMed ID: 7681852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Assessment of enzyme immunoassay and immunofluorescence tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Hipp SS, Han Y, Murphy D.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1987 Oct 03; 25(10):1938-43. PubMed ID: 3312290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparative evaluation of detection assays for Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Warren R, Dwyer B, Plackett M, Pettit K, Rizvi N, Baker AM.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Jun 03; 31(6):1663-6. PubMed ID: 8315015
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of patient characteristics on performance of an enzyme immunoassay for detecting cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
    Magder LS, Klontz KC, Bush LH, Barnes RC.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Apr 03; 28(4):781-4. PubMed ID: 2185264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Chlamydia trachomatis antigen detection by Chlamydiazyme combined with Chlamydia Blocking Reagent verification.
    Zeeberg B, Thelin I, Schalén C.
    Int J STD AIDS; 1992 Apr 03; 3(5):355-9. PubMed ID: 1391063
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.