These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

143 related items for PubMed ID: 14555434

  • 1. An evaluation of ASTM method P-42-97 for sampling and analysis of metalworking fluids.
    Glaser RA, Shulman S, Kurimo R, Piacitelli G.
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 Nov; 18(11):825-7. PubMed ID: 14555434
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Analytical performance criteria. Field evaluation of diacetyl sampling and analytical methods.
    Ashley K, McKernan LT, Burroughs E, Deddens J, Pendergrass S, Streicher RP.
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Nov; 5(11):D111-6. PubMed ID: 18726763
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Performance testing of NIOSH Method 5524/ASTM Method D-7049-04, for determination of metalworking fluids.
    Glaser R, Kurimo R, Shulman S.
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Aug; 4(8):583-95. PubMed ID: 17577749
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Metalworking fluids: oil mist and beyond.
    Gauthier SL.
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 Nov; 18(11):818-24. PubMed ID: 14555433
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Concerning sampler wall deposits in the chemical analysis of airborne metals.
    Harper M, Demange M.
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Sep; 4(9):D81-6. PubMed ID: 17613720
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evaluation of metal and carbon monoxide exposures during steel slab cutting and slitting.
    Burr G, Eisenberg J, Jang S.
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2013 Sep; 10(5):D57-61. PubMed ID: 23509948
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. An evaluation of analytical methods, air sampling techniques, and airborne occupational exposure of metalworking fluids.
    Verma DK, Shaw DS, Shaw ML, Julian JA, McCollin SA, des Tombe K.
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Feb; 3(2):53-66. PubMed ID: 16361218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effects of fluid composition on mist composition.
    White EM, Lucke WE.
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 Nov; 18(11):838-41. PubMed ID: 14555436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of the NIOSH MWF total particulate matter: thoracic particulate matter conversion factor in a machining environment.
    Reh BD, Harney JM, McCleery RE, Mueller CA.
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Apr; 2(4):239-43. PubMed ID: 15788385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Dustiness testing of materials handled at workplaces.
    Lidén G.
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Jul; 50(5):437-9. PubMed ID: 16849593
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The effect of a proposed change to fiber-counting rules in ASTM International Standard D7200-06.
    Harper M, Lee EG, Harvey B, Beard M.
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 May; 4(5):D42-5. PubMed ID: 17458031
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.