These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
95 related items for PubMed ID: 14559270
1. Source profiles for industrial, mobile, and area sources in the Big Bend Regional Aerosol Visibility and Observational study. Chow JC, Watson JG, Kuhns H, Etyemezian V, Lowenthal DH, Crow D, Kohl SD, Engelbrecht JP, Green MC. Chemosphere; 2004 Jan; 54(2):185-208. PubMed ID: 14559270 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative PM10-PM2.5 source contribution study at rural, urban and industrial sites during PM episodes in Eastern Spain. Rodríguez S, Querol X, Alastuey A, Viana MM, Alarcón M, Mantilla E, Ruiz CR. Sci Total Environ; 2004 Jul 26; 328(1-3):95-113. PubMed ID: 15207576 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Chemical mass balance source apportionment of PM10 and TSP in residential and industrial sites of an urban region of Kolkata, India. Gupta AK, Karar K, Srivastava A. J Hazard Mater; 2007 Apr 02; 142(1-2):279-87. PubMed ID: 16987605 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Characterization of PM2.5 and PM10 fugitive dust source profiles in the Athabasca Oil Sands Region. Wang X, Chow JC, Kohl SD, Percy KE, Legge AH, Watson JG. J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2015 Dec 02; 65(12):1421-33. PubMed ID: 26453048 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. PM2.5 chemical source profiles for vehicle exhaust, vegetative burning, geological material, and coal burning in Northwestern Colorado during 1995. Watson JG, Chow JC, Houck JE. Chemosphere; 2001 Jun 02; 43(8):1141-51. PubMed ID: 11368231 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterization of PM(2.5) in the ambient air of Shanghai City by analyzing individual particles. Yue W, Li X, Liu J, Li Y, Yu X, Deng B, Wan T, Zhang G, Huang Y, He W, Hua W, Shao L, Li W, Yang S. Sci Total Environ; 2006 Sep 15; 368(2-3):916-25. PubMed ID: 16782173 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of PM2.5 source apportionment using positive matrix factorization and molecular marker-based chemical mass balance. Ke L, Liu W, Wang Y, Russell AG, Edgerton ES, Zheng M. Sci Total Environ; 2008 May 15; 394(2-3):290-302. PubMed ID: 18313727 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. PM10 and PM2.5 chemical source profiles with optical attenuation and health risk indicators of paved and unpaved road dust in Bhopal, India. Samiksha S, Sunder Raman R, Nirmalkar J, Kumar S, Sirvaiya R. Environ Pollut; 2017 Mar 15; 222():477-485. PubMed ID: 28089210 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Levels and major sources of PM2.5 and PM10 in Bangkok Metropolitan Region. Chuersuwan N, Nimrat S, Lekphet S, Kerdkumrai T. Environ Int; 2008 Jul 15; 34(5):671-7. PubMed ID: 18258301 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Using a source-receptor approach to characterise VOC behaviour in a French urban area influenced by industrial emissions. Part II: source contribution assessment using the Chemical Mass Balance (CMB) model. Badol C, Locoge N, Galloo JC. Sci Total Environ; 2008 Jan 25; 389(2-3):429-40. PubMed ID: 17936336 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Source apportionment of PM2.5 in Beijing in 2004. Song Y, Tang X, Xie S, Zhang Y, Wei Y, Zhang M, Zeng L, Lu S. J Hazard Mater; 2007 Jul 19; 146(1-2):124-30. PubMed ID: 17208371 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Enrichment Factor and profiles of elemental composition of PM 2.5 in the city of Guadalajara, Mexico. Hernández-Mena L, Murillo-Tovar M, Ramírez-Muñíz M, Colunga-Urbina E, de la Garza-Rodríguez I, Saldarriaga-Noreña H. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2011 Nov 19; 87(5):545-9. PubMed ID: 21837390 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Semi-quantitative characterisation of ambient ultrafine aerosols resulting from emissions of coal fired power stations. Hinkley JT, Bridgman HA, Buhre BJ, Gupta RP, Nelson PF, Wall TF. Sci Total Environ; 2008 Feb 25; 391(1):104-13. PubMed ID: 18054995 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Application of the tracer-aerosol gradient interpretive technique to sulfur attribution for the big bend regional aerosol and visibility observational study. Green M, Kuhns H, Pitchford M, Dietz R, Ashbaugh L, Watson T. J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2003 May 25; 53(5):586-95. PubMed ID: 12774992 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Case study: inorganic pollutants associated with particulate matter from an area near a petrochemical plant. Bosco ML, Varrica D, Dongarrà G. Environ Res; 2005 Sep 25; 99(1):18-30. PubMed ID: 16053924 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Source characterization of major emission sources in the imperial and Mexicali Valleys along the US/Mexico border. Watson JG, Chow JC. Sci Total Environ; 2001 Aug 10; 276(1-3):33-47. PubMed ID: 11516138 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Source apportionment of fine carbonaceous particles by positive matrix factorization at Gosan background site in East Asia. Moon KJ, Han JS, Ghim YS, Kim YJ. Environ Int; 2008 Jul 10; 34(5):654-64. PubMed ID: 18255146 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Source apportionment of PM2.5 in Beijing using principal component analysis/absolute principal component scores and UNMIX. Song Y, Xie S, Zhang Y, Zeng L, Salmon LG, Zheng M. Sci Total Environ; 2006 Dec 15; 372(1):278-86. PubMed ID: 17097135 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A combined analysis to identify airborne PM10 sources. Gómez DR, Reich SL, Dawidowski LE, Vázquez C. J Environ Monit; 2005 Jan 15; 7(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 15614402 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Source identification of PM10, collected at a heavy-traffic roadside, by analyzing individual particles using synchrotron radiation. Yue W, Li Y, Li X, Yu X, Deng B, Liu J, Wan T, Zhang G, Huang Y, He W, Hua W. J Synchrotron Radiat; 2004 Sep 01; 11(Pt 5):428-31. PubMed ID: 15310960 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]