These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
159 related items for PubMed ID: 14564455
1. Assessment of the tibia using ultrasonic guided waves in pubertal girls. Moilanen P, Nicholson PH, Kärkkäinen T, Wang Q, Timonen J, Cheng S. Osteoporos Int; 2003 Dec; 14(12):1020-7. PubMed ID: 14564455 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Low-frequency axial ultrasound velocity correlates with bone mineral density and cortical thickness in the radius and tibia in pre- and postmenopausal women. Kilappa V, Moilanen P, Xu L, Nicholson PH, Timonen J, Cheng S. Osteoporos Int; 2011 Apr; 22(4):1103-13. PubMed ID: 20577874 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Bone geometry and density in the skeleton of pre-pubertal gymnasts and school children. Ward KA, Roberts SA, Adams JE, Mughal MZ. Bone; 2005 Jun; 36(6):1012-8. PubMed ID: 15876561 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Growth patterns at distal radius and tibial shaft in pubertal girls: a 2-year longitudinal study. Wang Q, Alén M, Nicholson P, Lyytikäinen A, Suuriniemi M, Helkala E, Suominen H, Cheng S. J Bone Miner Res; 2005 Jun; 20(6):954-61. PubMed ID: 15883635 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. An investigation of unique and shared gene effects on speed of sound and bone density using axial transmission quantitative ultrasound and DXA in twins. Knapp KM, Andrew T, MacGregor AJ, Blake GM, Fogelman I, Spector TD. J Bone Miner Res; 2003 Aug; 18(8):1525-30. PubMed ID: 12929943 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Cortical porosity is higher in boys compared with girls at the distal radius and distal tibia during pubertal growth: an HR-pQCT study. Nishiyama KK, Macdonald HM, Moore SA, Fung T, Boyd SK, McKay HA. J Bone Miner Res; 2012 Feb; 27(2):273-82. PubMed ID: 22028110 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative ultrasound measurements of the tibia and calcaneus in comparison with DXA measurements at various skeletal sites. Tromp AM, Smit JH, Deeg DJ, Lips P. Osteoporos Int; 1999 Feb; 9(3):230-5. PubMed ID: 10450412 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Monitoring bone growth using quantitative ultrasound in comparison with DXA and pQCT. Wang Q, Nicholson PH, Timonen J, Alen M, Moilanen P, Suominen H, Cheng S. J Clin Densitom; 2008 Feb; 11(2):295-301. PubMed ID: 18158265 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative ultrasound of the tibia depends on both cortical density and thickness. Prevrhal S, Fuerst T, Fan B, Njeh C, Hans D, Uffmann M, Srivastav S, Genant HK. Osteoporos Int; 2001 Feb; 12(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 11305080 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Peripheral quantitative Computed Tomography (pQCT), broad ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of ultrasound (SOS) in a normal population (426 females) aged 8 to 20 years]. Bagni B, Corazzari T, Saccani-Jotti G, Casolo A, Franceschetto A, Romagnoli R. Radiol Med; 2001 Oct; 102(4):217-21. PubMed ID: 11740447 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Calcaneal ultrasound imaging in healthy children and adolescents: relation of the ultrasound parameters BUA and SOS to age, body weight, height, foot dimensions and pubertal stage. van den Bergh JP, Noordam C, Ozyilmaz A, Hermus AR, Smals AG, Otten BJ. Osteoporos Int; 2000 Oct; 11(11):967-76. PubMed ID: 11193250 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of nutrition, puberty, and gender on bone ultrasound measurements in adolescents and young adults. Pettinato AA, Loud KJ, Bristol SK, Feldman HA, Gordon CM. J Adolesc Health; 2006 Dec; 39(6):828-34. PubMed ID: 17116512 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of vertebral strength in vitro by spinal bone densitometry and calcaneal ultrasound. Cheng XG, Nicholson PH, Boonen S, Lowet G, Brys P, Aerssens J, Van der Perre G, Dequeker J. J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Oct; 12(10):1721-8. PubMed ID: 9333134 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Pediatric reference curves for multi-site quantitative ultrasound and its modulators. Zadik Z, Price D, Diamond G. Osteoporos Int; 2003 Oct; 14(10):857-62. PubMed ID: 12915957 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of three ultrasonic axial transmission methods for bone assessment. Muller M, Moilanen P, Bossy E, Nicholson P, Kilappa V, Timonen J, Talmant M, Cheng S, Laugier P. Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 May; 31(5):633-42. PubMed ID: 15866413 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of region of interest and bone size on calcaneal BMD: implications for the accuracy of quantitative ultrasound assessments at the calcaneus. Cheng S, Njeh CF, Fan B, Cheng X, Hans D, Wang L, Fuerst T, Genant HK. Br J Radiol; 2002 Jan; 75(889):59-68. PubMed ID: 11806960 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Progress in measurement of the calcaneus using ultrasonic methods in children and adolescents]. Jaworski M, Lorenc RS. Przegl Lek; 2000 Jan; 57(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 10907350 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]