These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


167 related items for PubMed ID: 14564662

  • 1. Cortical responses to cochlear implant stimulation: channel interactions.
    Bierer JA, Middlebrooks JC.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2004 Mar; 5(1):32-48. PubMed ID: 14564662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effects of cochlear-implant pulse rate and inter-channel timing on channel interactions and thresholds.
    Middlebrooks JC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jul; 116(1):452-68. PubMed ID: 15296005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Threshold and channel interaction in cochlear implant users: evaluation of the tripolar electrode configuration.
    Bierer JA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Mar; 121(3):1642-53. PubMed ID: 17407901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration.
    Bierer JA, Middlebrooks JC.
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):478-92. PubMed ID: 11784764
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interfaces: electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses measured with the partial tripolar configuration.
    Bierer JA, Faulkner KF, Tremblay KL.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Jan; 32(4):436-44. PubMed ID: 21178633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Cochlear-implant high pulse rate and narrow electrode configuration impair transmission of temporal information to the auditory cortex.
    Middlebrooks JC.
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jul; 100(1):92-107. PubMed ID: 18450583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Tripolar configuration and pulse shape in cochlear implants reduce channel interactions in the temporal domain.
    Quass GL, Kral A.
    Hear Res; 2024 Mar 01; 443():108953. PubMed ID: 38277881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Topographic spread of inferior colliculus activation in response to acoustic and intracochlear electric stimulation.
    Snyder RL, Bierer JA, Middlebrooks JC.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2004 Sep 01; 5(3):305-22. PubMed ID: 15492888
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparisons between detection threshold and loudness perception for individual cochlear implant channels.
    Bierer JA, Nye AD.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Sep 01; 35(6):641-51. PubMed ID: 25036146
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Cochlear implant electrode configuration effects on activation threshold and tonotopic selectivity.
    Snyder RL, Middlebrooks JC, Bonham BH.
    Hear Res; 2008 Jan 01; 235(1-2):23-38. PubMed ID: 18037252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Electrophysiological channel interactions using focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants.
    George SS, Shivdasani MN, Wise AK, Shepherd RK, Fallon JB.
    J Neural Eng; 2015 Dec 01; 12(6):066005. PubMed ID: 26401834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interface: partial tripolar, single-channel thresholds and psychophysical tuning curves.
    Bierer JA, Faulkner KF.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr 01; 31(2):247-58. PubMed ID: 20090533
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Spread of excitation and channel interaction in single- and dual-electrode cochlear implant stimulation.
    Snel-Bongers J, Briaire JJ, Vanpoucke FJ, Frijns JH.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Apr 01; 33(3):367-76. PubMed ID: 22048258
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Auditory cortex phase locking to amplitude-modulated cochlear implant pulse trains.
    Middlebrooks JC.
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jul 01; 100(1):76-91. PubMed ID: 18367697
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Auditory cortical responses to electrical stimulation of the inferior colliculus: implications for an auditory midbrain implant.
    Lim HH, Anderson DJ.
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 Sep 01; 96(3):975-88. PubMed ID: 16723413
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Unanesthetized auditory cortex exhibits multiple codes for gaps in cochlear implant pulse trains.
    Kirby AE, Middlebrooks JC.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2012 Feb 01; 13(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 21969022
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Bilateral Changes of Spontaneous Activity Within the Central Auditory Pathway Upon Chronic Unilateral Intracochlear Electrical Stimulation.
    Basta D, Götze R, Gröschel M, Jansen S, Janke O, Tzschentke B, Boyle P, Ernst A.
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Dec 01; 36(10):1759-65. PubMed ID: 26571409
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.