These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

190 related items for PubMed ID: 14571541

  • 1. The use of actuarials at civil commitment hearings to predict the likelihood of future sexual violence.
    Berlin FS, Galbreath NW, Geary B, McGlone G.
    Sex Abuse; 2003 Oct; 15(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 14571541
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Men in his category have a 50% likelihood, but which half is he in? Comments on Berlin, Galbreath, Geary, and McGlone.
    Harris G.
    Sex Abuse; 2003 Oct; 15(4):389-92. PubMed ID: 14571543
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Actuarial risk assessment: commentary on Berlin et al.
    Hart SD.
    Sex Abuse; 2003 Oct; 15(4):383-8. PubMed ID: 14571542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Evaluation for civil commitment of sex offenders: a survey of experts.
    Jackson RL, Hess DT.
    Sex Abuse; 2007 Dec; 19(4):425-48. PubMed ID: 18000756
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Unguided clinical and actuarial assessment of re-offending risk: a direct comparison with sex offenders in Denmark.
    Bengtson S, Långström N.
    Sex Abuse; 2007 Jun; 19(2):135-53. PubMed ID: 17534713
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Mental disorder, predisposition, prediction, and ability to control: evaluating sex offenders for civil commitment.
    Elwood RW.
    Sex Abuse; 2009 Dec; 21(4):395-411. PubMed ID: 19901235
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Forensic assessment of violence risk].
    Pujol Robinat A, Mohíno Justes S, Gómez-Durán EL.
    Med Clin (Barc); 2014 Mar; 142 Suppl 2():16-23. PubMed ID: 24913749
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Applying a forensic actuarial assessment (the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide) to nonforensic patients.
    Harris GT, Rice ME, Camilleri JA.
    J Interpers Violence; 2004 Sep; 19(9):1063-74. PubMed ID: 15296617
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Another look at interpreting risk categories.
    Mossman D.
    Sex Abuse; 2006 Jan; 18(1):41-63. PubMed ID: 16639536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Alice in actuarial-land: through the looking glass of changing Static-99 norms.
    Sreenivasan S, Weinberger LE, Frances A, Cusworth-Walker S.
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010 Jan; 38(3):400-6. PubMed ID: 20852227
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Sexually violent predator evaluations: empirical evidence, strategies for professionals, and research directions.
    Miller HA, Amenta AE, Conroy MA.
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Feb; 29(1):29-54. PubMed ID: 15865331
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Utilization and implications of the Static-99 in practice.
    Storey JE, Watt KA, Jackson KJ, Hart SD.
    Sex Abuse; 2012 Jun; 24(3):289-302. PubMed ID: 22344781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Actuarial assessment of sex offender recidivism risk: a cross-validation of the RRASOR and the Static-99 in Sweden.
    Sjöstedt G, Långström N.
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Dec; 25(6):629-45. PubMed ID: 11771638
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Sex offenders and actuarial risk assessments: ethical considerations.
    Campbell TW.
    Behav Sci Law; 2003 Dec; 21(2):269-79. PubMed ID: 12645049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A multisite comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders.
    Harris GT, Rice ME, Quinsey VL, Lalumière ML, Boer D, Lang C.
    Psychol Assess; 2003 Sep; 15(3):413-25. PubMed ID: 14593842
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Does Static-99 predict recidivism among older sexual offenders?
    Hanson RK.
    Sex Abuse; 2006 Oct; 18(4):343-55. PubMed ID: 17136627
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Evaluation of risk assessment instruments for sex offenders].
    Stadtland C, Hollweg M, Kleindienst N, Dietl J, Reich U, Nedopil N.
    Nervenarzt; 2006 May; 77(5):587-95. PubMed ID: 15965760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A mathematical proof and example that Bayes's Theorem is fundamental to actuarial estimates of sexual recidivism risk.
    Donaldson T, Wollert R.
    Sex Abuse; 2008 Jun; 20(2):206-17. PubMed ID: 18490482
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Optimizing risk mitigation in management of sexual offenders: a structural model.
    Lamade R, Gabriel A, Prentky R.
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2011 Jun; 34(3):217-25. PubMed ID: 21565406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.