These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

101 related items for PubMed ID: 145788

  • 1. Diagnostic accuracy of clinicians, the VA program and the Mount Sinai program in the interpretation of electrocardiograms as compared with clinicopathological data.
    Bourdillon PJ, Kilpatrick D.
    Adv Cardiol; 1978; 21():165-7. PubMed ID: 145788
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Clinicians, the Mount Sinai program and the Veterans' Administration program evaluated against clinico-pathological data derived independently of the electrocardiogram.
    Bourdillon PJ, Kilpatrick D.
    Eur J Cardiol; 1978 Nov; 8(4-5):395-412. PubMed ID: 152709
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of automated processing of electrocardiograms by the Veterans Administration program (AVA 3.4).
    Brohet CR, Richman HG.
    Am J Cardiol; 1979 Jun; 43(6):1167-74. PubMed ID: 155985
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A method for evaluating computer programs for electrocardiographic interpretation. II. Application to version D of the PHS program and the Mayo Clinic program of 1968.
    Bailey JJ, Itscoitz SB, Grauer LE, Hirshfeld JW, Horton MR.
    Circulation; 1974 Jul; 50(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 4276019
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evaluation of a computer programme for interpretation of 12-lead electrocardiograms.
    Landelius J, Nordgren L.
    Ups J Med Sci; 1979 Jul; 84(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 155918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Problems in comparing program systems for computer analysis of electrocardiograms].
    Scheidt E, Michaelis J, von Egidy H, Recke S, Lippold R.
    Methods Inf Med Suppl; 1973 Jul; 7():423-8. PubMed ID: 4281849
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [A method of global evaluation of a program for automatic ECG analysis. The Demeester-Saget program].
    Dragodanne C, Frank R, Thomas D, Berger C, Hirel JC, Grosgogeat Y.
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1981 Jul; 74(7):771-80. PubMed ID: 6457577
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Computer analysis of electrocardiograms with six and twelve leads.
    Schneider PJ, Cooper JK, Birch AA, Dwyer EM.
    Public Health Rep (1896); 1970 Oct; 85(10):853-8. PubMed ID: 4248414
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Canadian Colloquium on Computer-Assisted Interpretation of Electrocardiograms. II. Some considerations relevant to the selection of ECG Program.
    Milliken JA.
    Can Med Assoc J; 1973 May 19; 108(10):1232-8. PubMed ID: 4574246
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The tall R wave in the right precordial leads.
    Zema MJ.
    J Electrocardiol; 1978 Oct 19; 11(4):407. PubMed ID: 152347
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Letter: Evaluating computer ECG programs.
    Pipberger HV, Cornfield J.
    Circulation; 1974 Dec 19; 50(6):1287-8. PubMed ID: 4279148
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.