These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

569 related items for PubMed ID: 14579952

  • 1. Evaluation of the precision of fit between the Procera custom abutment and various implant systems.
    Lang LA, Sierraalta M, Hoffensperger M, Wang RF.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):652-8. PubMed ID: 14579952
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Examination of the implant-abutment interface after fatigue testing.
    Cibirka RM, Nelson SK, Lang BR, Rueggeberg FA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):268-75. PubMed ID: 11264934
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. An in vitro evaluation of titanium, zirconia, and alumina procera abutments with hexagonal connection.
    Vigolo P, Fonzi F, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006 Mar; 21(4):575-80. PubMed ID: 16955608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
    Nguyen HQ, Tan KB, Nicholls JI.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 Mar; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Measurement of the rotational misfit and implant-abutment gap of all-ceramic abutments.
    Garine WN, Funkenbusch PD, Ercoli C, Wodenscheck J, Murphy WC.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007 Mar; 22(6):928-38. PubMed ID: 18271374
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The Procera abutment--the fifth generation abutment for dental implants.
    Kucey BK, Fraser DC.
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2000 Sep; 66(8):445-9. PubMed ID: 11040529
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Implant abutment screw rotations and preloads for four different screw materials and surfaces.
    Martin WC, Woody RD, Miller BH, Miller AW.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jul; 86(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 11458261
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. An in vitro evaluation of fit of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic four-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems, before and after porcelain firing cycles and after glaze cycles.
    Vigolo P, Fonzi F.
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):621-6. PubMed ID: 18798783
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Influence of the height of the external hexagon and surface treatment on fatigue life of commercially pure titanium dental implants.
    Gil FJ, Aparicio C, Manero JM, Padros A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 Dec; 24(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 19885397
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Zirconia-implant-supported all-ceramic crowns withstand long-term load: a pilot investigation.
    Kohal RJ, Klaus G, Strub JR.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 16958698
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Regular and platform switching: bone stress analysis varying implant type.
    Gurgel-Juarez NC, de Almeida EO, Rocha EP, Freitas AC, Anchieta RB, de Vargas LC, Kina S, França FM.
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 22372756
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Critical bending moment of implant-abutment screw joint interfaces: effect of torque levels and implant diameter.
    Tan BF, Tan KB, Nicholls JI.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004 Apr; 19(5):648-58. PubMed ID: 15508980
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Evaluation of a new method to achieve optimal passivity of implant-supported superstructures.
    Goossens IC, Herbst D.
    SADJ; 2003 Aug; 58(7):279-85, 287. PubMed ID: 14649041
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of fit accuracy between Procera® custom abutments and three implant systems.
    de Morais Alves da Cunha T, de Araújo RP, da Rocha PV, Amoedo RM.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Dec; 14(6):890-5. PubMed ID: 21176100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutments with CAD/CAM commercially fabricated zirconia implant abutments.
    Kim S, Kim HI, Brewer JD, Monaco EA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):226-30. PubMed ID: 19328275
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.
    Sailer I, Sailer T, Stawarczyk B, Jung RE, Hämmerle CH.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 Apr; 24(5):850-8. PubMed ID: 19865625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Stress distribution on external hexagon implant system using 3d finite element analysis.
    Segundo RM, Oshima HM, Silva IN, Júnior LH, Mota EG, Coelho LF.
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2007 Apr; 20(2):79-81. PubMed ID: 18590255
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutment.
    Protopapadaki M, Monaco EA, Kim HI, Davis EL.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 24011801
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Variation in the total lengths of abutment/implant assemblies generated with a function of applied tightening torque in external and internal implant-abutment connection.
    Kim KS, Lim YJ, Kim MJ, Kwon HB, Yang JH, Lee JB, Yim SH.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Aug; 22(8):834-9. PubMed ID: 21198900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.
    Hoyer SA, Stanford CM, Buranadham S, Fridrich T, Wagner J, Gratton D.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 29.