These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


111 related items for PubMed ID: 14586347

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Prenatal prediction of postnatal large-for-dates neonates using a simplified MRI method: comparison with conventional 2D ultrasound estimates.
    Kadji C, Cannie MM, De Angelis R, Camus M, Klass M, Fellas S, Cecotti V, Dütemeyer V, Jani JC.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 52(2):250-257. PubMed ID: 28508549
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of conventional 2D ultrasound to magnetic resonance imaging for prenatal estimation of birthweight in twin pregnancy.
    Kadji C, Bevilacqua E, Hurtado I, Carlin A, Cannie MM, Jani JC.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 218(1):128.e1-128.e11. PubMed ID: 29045850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Accuracy of sonographic fetal weight estimation within 14 days of delivery in a Jordanian population using Hadlock formula 1.
    Basha AS, Abu-Khader IB, Qutishat RM, Amarin ZO.
    Med Princ Pract; 2012 Jan; 21(4):366-9. PubMed ID: 22286836
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A Longitudinal Study on Fetal Weight Estimation at Third Trimester of Pregnancy: Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and 2-D Ultrasound Predictions.
    Kadji C, Cannie MM, Van Wettere M, Bevilacqua E, Dütemeyer V, Strizek B, Khalifé J, Kang X, Jani JC.
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2017 Jan; 42(3):181-188. PubMed ID: 28407631
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Good accuracy of ultrasound estimations of fetal weight performed by midwives.
    Mattsson N, Rosendahl H, Luukkaala T.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007 Jan; 86(6):688-92. PubMed ID: 17520400
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Optimization of fetal weight estimates using MRI: comparison of acquisitions.
    Hassibi S, Farhataziz N, Zaretsky M, McIntire D, Twickler DM.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Aug; 183(2):487-92. PubMed ID: 15269045
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Validity of common ultrasound methods of fetal weight estimation in late pregnancy among women in Kwale, Niger Delta region, Nigeria.
    Eze CU, Egwuanumku KI, Agwuna KK, Odidi L, Ochie K, Nwadike IU.
    Afr Health Sci; 2015 Mar; 15(1):206-16. PubMed ID: 25834550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Sonographic fetal weight estimation in normal and overweight/obese healthy term pregnant women by gestation-adjusted projection (GAP) method.
    Paganelli S, Soncini E, Comitini G, Palomba S, La Sala GB.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Apr; 293(4):775-81. PubMed ID: 26482584
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Magnetic resonance imaging compared to ultrasonography in fetal weight and volume estimation in diabetic and normal pregnancy.
    Uotila J, Dastidar P, Heinonen T, Ryymin P, Punnonen R, Laasonen E.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Apr; 79(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 10746838
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A new sonographic weight formula for fetuses <or= 2500 g.
    Siemer J, Hilbert A, Hart N, Meurer B, Goecke T, Schild RL.
    Ultraschall Med; 2009 Feb; 30(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 19137495
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.