These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

322 related items for PubMed ID: 14589476

  • 21. Biomechanical strength comparison of pedicle screw augmentation using poly-dicalcium phosphate dihydrate (P-DCPD) and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cements.
    Criado A, Yokhana S, Rahman T, McCarty S, Andrecovich C, Ren W, Yassir WK.
    Spine Deform; 2020 Apr; 8(2):165-170. PubMed ID: 32030639
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Effect of pedicle screw augmentation with a self-curing elastomeric material under cranio-caudal cyclic loading-a cadaveric biomechanical study.
    Schmoelz W, Keiler A, Konschake M, Lindtner RA, Gasbarrini A.
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Oct 11; 13(1):251. PubMed ID: 30305126
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Is it safe to back out pedicle screws after augmentation with polymethyl methacrylate or calcium phosphate cement? A biomechanical study.
    Cho W, Wu C, Zheng X, Erkan S, Suratwala SJ, Mehbod AA, Transfeldt EE.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jun 11; 24(4):276-9. PubMed ID: 20975600
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Effect of augmentation techniques on the failure of pedicle screws under cranio-caudal cyclic loading.
    Bostelmann R, Keiler A, Steiger HJ, Scholz A, Cornelius JF, Schmoelz W.
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Jan 11; 26(1):181-188. PubMed ID: 25813011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Restoration of pull-out strength of the failed pedicle screw: biomechanical comparison of calcium sulfate vs polymethylmethacrylate augmentation.
    Güler UO, Derincek A, Hersekli MA, Ozalay M, Cinar BM, Acaroğlu E.
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2014 Jan 11; 48(2):202-6. PubMed ID: 24747630
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Fixation strength of PMMA-augmented pedicle screws after depth adjustment in a synthetic bone model of osteoporosis.
    Ying SH, Kao HC, Chang MC, Yu WK, Wang ST, Liu CL.
    Orthopedics; 2012 Oct 11; 35(10):e1511-6. PubMed ID: 23027489
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.