These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
278 related items for PubMed ID: 1459005
1. DNA quantification of squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus by flow cytometry and cytophotometric image analysis using formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue. Dorman AM, Walsh TN, Droogan O, Curran B, Hourihane DO, Hennessy TP, Leader M. Cytometry; 1992; 13(8):886-92. PubMed ID: 1459005 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. DNA image cytometry on sections as compared with image cytometry on smears and flow cytometry in melanoma. Klapperstück T, Wohlrab W. Cytometry; 1996 Sep 01; 25(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 8875057 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [DNA cytometry using paraffin embedded tumor tissues. Comparison of flow cytometry (FCM) and image cytometry (ICM)]. Baretton G, Blasenbreu S, Li X, DePascale T, Löhrs U. Zentralbl Pathol; 1994 Feb 01; 139(6):419-25. PubMed ID: 7512820 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Caveats in the estimation of DNA-ploidy in paraffin embedded specimens of primary prostate cancer and lymph node metastases by flow and image cytometry. Berner A, Danielsen HE, Juul NO, Juul ME, Pettersen EO, Reith A, Nesland JM, Fosså SD. Anal Cell Pathol; 1993 Nov 01; 5(6):339-52. PubMed ID: 8305330 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Determination of DNA ploidy in archival tissue from non-Hodgkin's lymphoma using flow and image cytometry. Zbieranowski I, Le Riche JC, Palcic B, Gascoyne R, Connors J. Anal Cell Pathol; 1992 Jul 01; 4(4):303-13. PubMed ID: 1390299 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of flow and image cytometry for DNA content analysis of fresh and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue in breast carcinoma. Chen TL, Luo I, Mikhail N, Rasková J, Raska K. Cytometry; 1995 Sep 15; 22(3):181-9. PubMed ID: 8556949 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Correlation of flow and static cytometry; their application to the study of anaplastic lymphomas]. Marcos B, González-Ageitos A, García R, Echezarreta G, Sanz C, García MJ, Rivas C. Sangre (Barc); 1998 Feb 15; 43(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 9577179 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between flow cytometry and image cytometry in ploidy distribution assessments in gynecologic cancer. Kaern J, Wetteland J, Tropé CG, Farrants GW, Juhng SW, Pettersen EO, Reith A, Danielsen HE. Cytometry; 1992 Feb 15; 13(3):314-21. PubMed ID: 1576895 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Image analysis of DNA cytometry for assessing prognosis after resection of esophageal cancer]. Böttger T, Störkel S, Stöckle M, Wahl W, Heintz A, Jugenheimer M, Effenberger-Kim O, Vinh T, Junginger T. Chirurg; 1991 Jun 15; 62(6):467-72; discussion 472-3. PubMed ID: 1655366 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Methodological aspects on cytochemical DNA assessment of adenocarcinoma of the endometrium by means of image and flow cytometry using conventionally formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded specimens. Askensten U, Moberger B, Auer G. Arch Geschwulstforsch; 1990 Jun 15; 60(3):209-16. PubMed ID: 1695087 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Flow-cytometric analysis of the DNA content in paraffin-embedded tissue and in fresh tumour samples obtained from renal cell carcinoma: comparison of DNA ploidy using ethidium bromide and mithramycin. Fischer C, Knaust KO, Schauer A, Ringert RH. Anticancer Res; 1996 Jun 15; 16(5A):2575-80. PubMed ID: 8917354 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Flow cytometric DNA analysis of submucosal carcinoma of the esophagus. Hui AM, Itabashi M, Kato H, Tachimori Y, Watanabe H, Hirota T. Jpn J Clin Oncol; 1994 Feb 15; 24(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 8126917 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of image (CAS 200) and flow cytometry determined DNA content of paraffin-embedded Hodgkin's disease tissue. Erdkamp FL, Schouten HC, Breed WP, Janssen WC, Hoffmann JJ, Reynders M, Schutte B, Blijham GH. Hematol Pathol; 1994 Feb 15; 8(3):75-84. PubMed ID: 7982854 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of a flow cytometric method to determine DNA ploidy of oesophageal cancer cells obtained by forceps biopsy samples during oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopy. Rickes S, Hauptmann S, Flath B, Abbenseth R, Zwiebel FM, Possinger K. Onkologie; 2003 Feb 15; 26(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 12624515 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. DNA ploidy in soft tissue sarcoma: comparison of flow and image cytometry with clinical follow-up in 93 patients. Dreinhöfer KE, Baldetorp B, Akerman M, Fernö M, Rydholm A, Gustafson P. Cytometry; 2002 Feb 15; 50(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 11857594 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Ploidy as a prognostic indicator in oesophageal squamous carcinoma and its relationship to various histological criteria. Edwards JM, Jones DJ, Wilkes SJ, Hillier VF, Hasleton PS. J Pathol; 1989 Sep 15; 159(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 2809884 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Flow cytometry and interactive image cytometry in endometrial carcinoma. A comparative and prognostic study. Strang P, Stenkvist B, Bergström R, Stendahl U, Valdes del Campo M, Tribukait B. Anticancer Res; 1991 Sep 15; 11(2):783-8. PubMed ID: 2064334 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Flow cytometric analysis of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral and maxillofacial region]. Zhao FY. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1992 Jul 15; 27(4):222-4, 256. PubMed ID: 1303834 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Interpretation guidelines of DNA histograms from tissue sections of breast cancer. Aaltonen M, Kuopio T, Laine J, Alanen K, Juhola M, Collan Y. Anticancer Res; 2000 Jul 15; 20(1B):547-51. PubMed ID: 10769723 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Image analysis versus flow cytometry for DNA ploidy quantitation of solid tumors: a comparison of six methods of sample preparation. Danque PO, Chen HB, Patil J, Jagirdar J, Orsatti G, Paronetto F. Mod Pathol; 1993 May 15; 6(3):270-5. PubMed ID: 8346174 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]