These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

347 related items for PubMed ID: 14601847

  • 1. In-vivo slit scanning confocal microscopy of normal corneas in Indian eyes.
    Vanathi M, Tandon R, Sharma N, Titiyal JS, Pandey RM, Vajpayee RB.
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2003 Sep; 51(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 14601847
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Laser scanning in vivo confocal analysis of keratocyte density in keratoconus.
    Ku JY, Niederer RL, Patel DV, Sherwin T, McGhee CN.
    Ophthalmology; 2008 May; 115(5):845-50. PubMed ID: 17825419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. In vivo confocal microscopy for the evaluation of corneal microstructure in keratoconus.
    Mocan MC, Yilmaz PT, Irkec M, Orhan M.
    Curr Eye Res; 2008 Nov; 33(11):933-9. PubMed ID: 19085375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Clinical and microstructural analysis of patients with hyper-reflective corneal endothelial nuclei imaged by in vivo confocal microscopy.
    Patel DV, Phua YS, McGhee CN.
    Exp Eye Res; 2006 Apr; 82(4):682-7. PubMed ID: 16359661
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Normal human corneal cell populations evaluated by in vivo scanning slit confocal microscopy.
    Mustonen RK, McDonald MB, Srivannaboon S, Tan AL, Doubrava MW, Kim CK.
    Cornea; 1998 Sep; 17(5):485-92. PubMed ID: 9756442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of keratocyte density between keratoconus, post-laser in situ keratomileusis keratectasia, and uncomplicated post-laser in situ keratomileusis cases. A confocal scan study.
    Ali Javadi M, Kanavi MR, Mahdavi M, Yaseri M, Rabiei HM, Javadi A, Sajjadi SH.
    Cornea; 2009 Aug; 28(7):774-9. PubMed ID: 19574909
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Quantitative assessment of anteroposterior keratocyte density in the normal rabbit cornea.
    Petroll WM, Boettcher K, Barry P, Cavanagh HD, Jester JV.
    Cornea; 1995 Jan; 14(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 7712733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.