These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Evaluation of soft-tissue morphology of the face in 1,050 young adults. Borman H, Ozgür F, Gürsu G. Ann Plast Surg; 1999 Mar; 42(3):280-8. PubMed ID: 10096619 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Do the neoclassical canons still describe the beauty of faces? An anthropometric study on 50 Caucasian models. Torsello F, Mirigliani L, D'Alessio R, Deli R. Prog Orthod; 2010 Mar; 11(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 20529624 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Anthropometric Analysis of the Face. Zacharopoulos GV, Manios A, Kau CH, Velagrakis G, Tzanakakis GN, de Bree E. J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Jan; 27(1):e71-5. PubMed ID: 26703056 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Craniofacial morphometry by photographic evaluations. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Miani A, Tartaglia G. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Apr; 103(4):327-37. PubMed ID: 8480698 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Facial anthropometry in newborns in Pondicherry. Shah M, Verma IC, Mahadevan S, Puri RK. Indian J Pediatr; 1991 Apr; 58(2):259-63. PubMed ID: 1879908 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Sudanese female face: normative craniofacial measurements and comparison with African-American and North American White females. Salah M, Higzi MA, Ali RW, Naini FB. J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1704-9. PubMed ID: 25012648 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Anthropometric facial analysis of the African American woman. Porter JP, Olson KL. Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2001 Dec; 3(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 11497505 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional assessment of the relative contribution of genetics and environment to various facial parameters with the twin method. Naini FB, Moss JP. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Dec; 126(6):655-65. PubMed ID: 15592212 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Proportionality in Asian and North American Caucasian faces using neoclassical facial canons as criteria. Le TT, Farkas LG, Ngim RC, Levin LS, Forrest CR. Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2002 Dec; 26(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 11891603 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Craniofacial anthropometric norms of Malays. Ngeow WC, Aljunid ST. Singapore Med J; 2009 May; 50(5):525-8. PubMed ID: 19495526 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Do long-faced subjects really have a long anterior face? A longitudinal study. Ha Y, Park YS, Lee SP. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jun; 145(6):799-806. PubMed ID: 24880851 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Describing normal variations of head and face by using standard measurement and craniofacial variability index (CVI) in seven-year-old normal children. Ozdemir MB, Ilgaz A, Dilek A, Ayten H, Esat A. J Craniofac Surg; 2007 May; 18(3):470-4. PubMed ID: 17538305 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Proportion indices in the craniofacial regions of 284 healthy North American white children between 1 and 5 years of age. Farkas LG, Hreczko TM, Katic MJ, Forrest CR. J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Jan; 14(1):13-28. PubMed ID: 12544216 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Standards of soft tissue Arnett analysis for surgical planning in Turkish adults. Uysal T, Yagci A, Basciftci FA, Sisman Y. Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 19482876 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Revision of neoclassical facial canons in young adult Afro-Americans. Farkas LG, Forrest CR, Litsas L. Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2000 Aug; 24(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 10890944 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]