These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

334 related items for PubMed ID: 14628785

  • 1. Abortion and its viability standard: the woman's diminishing right to choose.
    Swyers MH.
    Geoge Mason Univ Civ Rights Law J; 1997; 8(1-2):87-109. PubMed ID: 14628785
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The Casey undue burden standard: problems predicted and encountered, and the split over the Salerno test.
    Burdick R.
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1996; 23():825-76. PubMed ID: 16086482
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Winter count: taking stock of abortion rights after Casey and Carhart.
    Borgmann CE.
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):675-716. PubMed ID: 16700116
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A woman's right to choose: wrongful death statutes and abortion rights--consistent at last.
    Siano JR.
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1998 Mar; 19(3):279-92. PubMed ID: 15871153
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Abortion: rights, responsibilities, obligations.
    Walsh KP.
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):63-4. PubMed ID: 21161852
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States.
    Weitz TA, Yanow S.
    Reprod Health Matters; 2008 May; 16(31 Suppl):99-107. PubMed ID: 18772090
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Roe v. Wade and the lesson of the pre-Roe case law.
    Morgan RG.
    Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1724-48. PubMed ID: 10245969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Inverting the viability test for abortion law.
    Ching B.
    Womens Rights Law Report; 2000 Aug; 22(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 16281341
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The partial death of abortion rights.
    Charo RA.
    N Engl J Med; 2007 May 24; 356(21):2125-8. PubMed ID: 17452437
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The argument that never ends.
    Simon R.
    US News World Rep; 2003 Jan 20; 134(2):24. PubMed ID: 12561696
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The intimidation of American physicians--banning partial-birth abortion.
    Greene MF.
    N Engl J Med; 2007 May 24; 356(21):2128-9. PubMed ID: 17452436
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care.
    Poppema ST.
    MedGenMed; 2007 May 24; 9(3):41; author reply 41. PubMed ID: 18159625
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care.
    Gartner EC.
    MedGenMed; 2007 May 24; 9(3):41; author reply 41. PubMed ID: 18159623
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights.
    Reilly EA.
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996 May 24; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Casey and its impact on abortion regulation.
    Moses MF.
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar 24; 31(3):805-15. PubMed ID: 16700123
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.
    Van Detta JA.
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001 Mar 24; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The Supreme Court and abortion rights.
    Annas GJ.
    N Engl J Med; 2007 May 24; 356(21):2201-7. PubMed ID: 17476003
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt.
    Harv Law Rev; 2016 Nov 24; 130(1):397-406. PubMed ID: 28117562
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Webster and women's equality.
    Johnsen D, Wilder MJ.
    Am J Law Med; 1989 Nov 24; 15(2-3):178-84. PubMed ID: 2603859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Webster versus reproductive health services.
    Rhodes AM.
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1989 Nov 24; 14(6):423. PubMed ID: 2514333
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.