These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


318 related items for PubMed ID: 14648416

  • 1. Is there a difference in diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact between endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography?
    Ainsworth AP, Rafaelsen SR, Wamberg PA, Durup J, Pless TK, Mortensen MB.
    Endoscopy; 2003 Dec; 35(12):1029-32. PubMed ID: 14648416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The substitution of endoscopic ultrasonography for endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography: implications for service development and training.
    Sahel J, Barthet M, Gasmi M.
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2004 Mar; 16(3):291-4. PubMed ID: 15195892
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraductal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in bile duct strictures: a prospective comparison of imaging diagnostics with histopathological correlation.
    Domagk D, Wessling J, Reimer P, Hertel L, Poremba C, Senninger N, Heinecke A, Domschke W, Menzel J.
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1684-9. PubMed ID: 15330902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Diagnostic value of secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (S-MRCP) after unsuccessful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)].
    Czakó L, Takács T, Morvay Z, Csernay L, Lonovics J.
    Orv Hetil; 2004 Mar 07; 145(10):529-34. PubMed ID: 15085592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Making cost-effectiveness analyses clinically relevant: the effect of provider expertise and biliary disease prevalence on the economic comparison of alternative diagnostic strategies.
    Carlos RC, Scheiman JM, Hussain HK, Song JH, Francis IR, Fendrick AM.
    Acad Radiol; 2003 Jun 07; 10(6):620-30. PubMed ID: 12809415
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [New diagnostic strategies in biliary-pancreatic diseases].
    Devière J, Matos C.
    Rev Med Brux; 2000 Sep 07; 21(4):A314-7. PubMed ID: 11068486
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Where do ERCP, endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and intraoperative cholangiography fit in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis? A decision analysis model.
    Arguedas MR, Dupont AW, Wilcox CM.
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Oct 07; 96(10):2892-9. PubMed ID: 11693323
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Value of magnetic-resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) after unsuccessful endoscopic-retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
    Owens GR, Shutz SM.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Feb 07; 49(2):265-6. PubMed ID: 10084882
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis: a prospective comparison study.
    Pungpapong S, Wallace MB, Woodward TA, Noh KW, Raimondo M.
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2007 Jan 07; 41(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 17198070
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Prospective assessment of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree.
    Taylor AC, Little AF, Hennessy OF, Banting SW, Smith PJ, Desmond PV.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Jan 07; 55(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 11756908
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.