These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


507 related items for PubMed ID: 14649041

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. In vitro vertical misfit evaluation of cast frameworks for cement-retained implant-supported partial prostheses.
    Oyagüe RC, Turrión AS, Toledano M, Monticelli F, Osorio R.
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18951675
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Analysis of stress distribution in a screw-retained implant prosthesis.
    Watanabe F, Uno I, Hata Y, Neuendorff G, Kirsch A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000 Jan; 15(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 10795453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Improving the fit of implant-supported superstructures using the spark erosion technique.
    Eisenmann E, Mokabberi A, Walter MH, Freesmeyer WB.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004 Jan; 19(6):810-8. PubMed ID: 15623055
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Marginal fit of cemented and screw-retained crowns incorporated on the Straumann (ITI) Dental Implant System: an in vitro study.
    Tosches NA, Brägger U, Lang NP.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jan; 20(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 19126111
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Fit of implant-supported fixed prostheses fabricated on master casts made from a dental stone and a dental plaster.
    Wise M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):532-8. PubMed ID: 11725282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Fit of implant frameworks: an in vitro comparison between two fabrication techniques.
    Takahashi T, Gunne J.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):256-60. PubMed ID: 12644800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. In vitro retentive strength of metal superstructures cemented to solid abutments.
    Rappelli G, Corso M, Coccia E, Camaioni E, Di Felice R, Procaccini M.
    Minerva Stomatol; 2008 Mar; 57(3):95-101. PubMed ID: 18427377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys.
    Erneklint C, Odman P, Ortengren U, Karlsson S.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006 Mar; 21(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 17066634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Preloads generated with repeated tightening in three types of screws used in dental implant assemblies.
    Byrne D, Jacobs S, O'Connell B, Houston F, Claffey N.
    J Prosthodont; 2006 Mar; 15(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 16681498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Marginal discrepancy of screw-retained and cemented metal-ceramic crowns on implants abutments.
    Keith SE, Miller BH, Woody RD, Higginbottom FL.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999 Mar; 14(3):369-78. PubMed ID: 10379110
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 26.