These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

108 related items for PubMed ID: 14657

  • 1. An evaluation of the AVL 937C blood-gas and pH microanalyser.
    Soutter WP, Aitchison TC, Thorburn J, Sharp F.
    Br J Anaesth; 1976 Dec; 48(12):1211-8. PubMed ID: 14657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A comparative study of the electrode systems of three pH and blood gas apparatus.
    Winckers EK, Teunissen AJ, Van den Camp RA, Maas AH.
    J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1978 Mar; 16(3):175-85. PubMed ID: 25944
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Instrumental variability of respiratory blood gases among different blood gas analysers in different laboratories.
    Kampelmacher MJ, van Kesteren RG, Winckers EK.
    Eur Respir J; 1997 Jun; 10(6):1341-4. PubMed ID: 9192940
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Continuous intra-arterial blood gas and pH monitoring in critically ill patients with severe respiratory failure: a prospective, criterion standard study.
    Haller M, Kilger E, Briegel J, Forst H, Peter K.
    Crit Care Med; 1994 Apr; 22(4):580-7. PubMed ID: 8143467
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A comparison of venous blood gas analysis with paired specimens collected in syringes and evacuated blood collection tubes.
    Tang NY, Leanse JH, Tesic V, van Wijk XMR.
    Clin Chim Acta; 2020 Nov; 510():671-674. PubMed ID: 32818493
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Long-term evaluation of a continuous intra-arterial blood gas monitoring system in patients with severe respiratory failure.
    Kilger E, Briegel J, Schelling G, Polasek J, Manert W, Groh J, Haller M.
    Infusionsther Transfusionsmed; 1995 Apr; 22(2):98-104. PubMed ID: 7787410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Re-evaluation of cord blood arterial and venous reference ranges for pH, pO(2), pCO(2), according to spontaneous or cesarean delivery.
    Kotaska K, Urinovska R, Klapkova E, Prusa R, Rob L, Binder T.
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2010 Apr; 24(5):300-4. PubMed ID: 20872563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Syringe injection pressure: a neglected factor in blood PO2 determination.
    Gosling P, Dickson G.
    Ann Clin Biochem; 1990 Mar; 27 ( Pt 2)():147-51. PubMed ID: 2109568
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Umbilical cord pH and PCO2: effect of interval from delivery to determination.
    Strickland DM, Gilstrap LC, Hauth JC, Widmer K.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Jan 15; 148(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 6419613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Source of error on A-aDO2 calculated from blood stored in plastic and glass syringes.
    Wu EY, Barazanji KW, Johnson RL.
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 1997 Jan 15; 82(1):196-202. PubMed ID: 9029216
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effect of delays in collection or analysis on the results of umbilical cord blood measurements.
    Sykes GS, Molloy PM.
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1984 Oct 15; 91(10):989-92. PubMed ID: 6435668
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.