These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
171 related items for PubMed ID: 14677621
1. Cycle control, safety and efficacy of a 24-day regimen of gestodene 60 microg/ ethinylestradiol 15 microg and a 21-day regimen of desogestrel 150 microg/ethinylestradiol 20 microg. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 1999 Nov; 4 Suppl 2():17-25. PubMed ID: 14677621 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A clinical overview of a new triphasic contraceptive containing gestodene. Christie T. Int J Fertil; 1989 Sep; 34 Suppl():40-9. PubMed ID: 2576257 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of two monophasic oral contraceptives: gestodene/ethinyl estradiol versus desogestrel/ethinyl estradiol. Benagiano G. Int J Fertil; 1989 Sep; 34 Suppl():31-9. PubMed ID: 2576255 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative study of the effects of gestodene 60 microg/ethinylestradiol 15 microg and desogestrel 150 microg/ethinylestradiol 20 microg on hemostatic balance, blood lipid levels and carbohydrate metabolism. van der Mooren MJ, Klipping C, van Aken B, Helmerhorst E, Spielmann D, Kluft C. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 1999 Nov; 4 Suppl 2():27-35. PubMed ID: 14677622 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of efficacy, cycle control, and tolerability of two low-dose oral contraceptives in a multicenter clinical study. Endrikat J, Düsterberg B, Ruebig A, Gerlinger C, Strowitzki T. Contraception; 1999 Nov; 60(5):269-74. PubMed ID: 10717778 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative study on the acceptability of two modern monophasic oral contraceptive preparations: 30 microgram ethinyl estradiol combined with 150 microgram desogestrel or 75 microgram gestodene. Zichella L, Sbrignadello C, Tomassini A, Di Lieto A, Montoneri C, Zarbo G, Mancone M, Pietrobattista P, Bertoli G, Perrone G. Adv Contracept; 1999 Nov; 15(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 11019950 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A twelve-month comparative clinical investigation of two low-dose oral contraceptives containing 20 micrograms ethinylestradiol/75 micrograms gestodene and 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol/75 micrograms gestodene, with respect to efficacy, cycle control, and tolerance. Endrikat J, Müller U, Düsterberg B. Contraception; 1997 Mar; 55(3):131-7. PubMed ID: 9115000 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy, cycle control and side-effects of two monophasic combination oral contraceptives: gestodene/ethinylestradiol and norgestimate/ethinylestradiol. Affinito P, Monterubbianesi M, Primizia M, Regine V, Di Carlo C, Farace MJ, Petrillo G, Nappi C. Gynecol Endocrinol; 1993 Dec; 7(4):259-66. PubMed ID: 8147235 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A twelve-month comparative clinical investigation of two low-dose oral contraceptives containing 20 micrograms ethinylestradiol/75 micrograms gestodene and 20 micrograms ethinylestradiol/150 micrograms desogestrel, with respect to efficacy, cycle control and tolerance. Endrikat J, Jaques MA, Mayerhofer M, Pelissier C, Müller U, Düsterberg B. Contraception; 1995 Oct; 52(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 8605781 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of gestodene and desogestrel as components of low-dose oral contraceptives on the pharmacokinetics of ethinyl estradiol (EE2), on serum CBG and on urinary cortisol and 6 beta-hydroxycortisol. Hammerstein J, Daume E, Simon A, Winkler UH, Schindler AE, Back DJ, Ward S, Neiss A. Contraception; 1993 Mar; 47(3):263-81. PubMed ID: 8462317 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]