These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

575 related items for PubMed ID: 14679570

  • 21. Cationic surfactants for micellar electrokinetic chromatography: 1. Characterization of selectivity using the linear solvation energy relationships model.
    Schnee VP, Palmer CP.
    Electrophoresis; 2008 Feb; 29(4):767-76. PubMed ID: 18297644
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Novel alkyl-modified anionic siloxanes as pseudostationary phases for electrokinetic chromatography: II. Selectivity studied by linear solvation energy relationships.
    Peterson DS, Palmer CP.
    Electrophoresis; 2001 Oct; 22(16):3562-6. PubMed ID: 11669542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Solute-solvent interactions in micellar electrokinetic chromatography: V. Factors that produce peak splitting.
    Ràfols C, Poza A, Fuguet E, Rosés M, Bosch E.
    Electrophoresis; 2002 Aug; 23(15):2408-16. PubMed ID: 12210196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Glycine-based polymeric surfactants with varied polar head group: II. chemical selectivity in micellar electrokinetic chromatography using linear solvation energy relationships.
    Shamsi SA, Iqbal R, Akbay C.
    Electrophoresis; 2005 Nov; 26(21):4138-52. PubMed ID: 16252318
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Linear solvation energy relationships of anionic dimeric surfactants in micellar electrokinetic chromatography I. Effect of the length of a hydrophobic spacer.
    Van Biesen G, Bottaro CS.
    J Chromatogr A; 2007 Jul 20; 1157(1-2):437-45. PubMed ID: 17482628
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Solute-solvent interactions in micellar electrokinetic chromatography: VII. Characterization of sodium cholate-sodium deoxycholate mixed-micellar systems.
    Hidalgo-Rodríguez M, Fuguet E, Ràfols C, Rosés M.
    J Chromatogr A; 2010 Mar 05; 1217(10):1701-8. PubMed ID: 20092822
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Effect of surfactant counterion and organic modifier on the properties of surfactant vesicles in electrokinetic chromatography.
    Schuster SA, Foley JP.
    J Sep Sci; 2005 Aug 05; 28(12):1399-408. PubMed ID: 16138692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Selectivity of single, mixed, and modified pseudostationary phases in electrokinetic chromatography.
    Fuguet E, Ràfols C, Bosch E, Abraham MH, Rosés M.
    Electrophoresis; 2006 May 05; 27(10):1900-14. PubMed ID: 16607607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Polymers of sodium-N-undec-10-ene-1-oyl taurate and sodium-N-undec-10-ene-1-oyl aminoethyl-2-phosphonate as pseudostationary phases for electrokinetic chromatography.
    Tellman KT, Palmer CP.
    Electrophoresis; 1999 Jan 05; 20(1):152-61. PubMed ID: 10065972
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Micellization and synergistic interaction of binary surfactant mixtures based on sodium nonylphenol polyoxyethylene ether sulfate.
    Chen ZX, Deng SP, Li XK.
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2008 Feb 15; 318(2):389-96. PubMed ID: 18005979
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Effect of light on self-assembly of aqueous mixtures of sodium dodecyl sulfate and a cationic, bolaform surfactant containing azobenzene.
    Hubbard FP, Abbott NL.
    Langmuir; 2007 Apr 24; 23(9):4819-29. PubMed ID: 17381141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Cationic gemini surfactants as pseudostationary phases in micellar electrokinetic chromatography. Part I: effect of head group.
    Akbay C, Hoyos Y, Hooper E, Arslan H, Rizvi SA.
    J Chromatogr A; 2010 Aug 06; 1217(32):5279-87. PubMed ID: 20598697
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Influence of ester and amide-containing surfactant headgroups on selectivity in micellar electrokinetic chromatography.
    Trone MD, Khaledi MG.
    Electrophoresis; 2000 Jul 06; 21(12):2390-6. PubMed ID: 10939450
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Effects of organic modifiers on solute retention and electrokinetic migrations in micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography.
    Liu Z, Zou H, Ye M, Ni J, Zhang Y.
    Electrophoresis; 1999 Oct 06; 20(14):2898-908. PubMed ID: 10546826
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Polymeric and polymer-supported pseudostationary phases in micellar electrokinetic chromatography: performance and selectivity.
    Palmer CP.
    Electrophoresis; 2000 Dec 06; 21(18):4054-72. PubMed ID: 11192124
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Study of chemical selectivity of molecular binary mixed micelles of sodium 10-undecenyl sulfate and sodium N-undecenyl leucinate using linear solvation energy relationships model.
    Ahmed HH, Ahlstrom DM, Arslan H, Guzel M, Akbay C.
    J Chromatogr A; 2012 May 04; 1236():207-14. PubMed ID: 22446078
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Application of linear solvation energy relationships to polymeric pseudostationary phases in micellar electrokinetic chromatography.
    Fujimoto C.
    Electrophoresis; 2001 Apr 04; 22(7):1322-9. PubMed ID: 11379954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Polymeric alkenoxy amino acid surfactants: III. Chiral separations of binaphthyl derivatives.
    Rizvi SA, Simons DN, Shamsi SA.
    Electrophoresis; 2004 Feb 04; 25(4-5):712-22. PubMed ID: 14981700
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Origins of the viscosity peak in wormlike micellar solutions. 1. Mixed catanionic surfactants. A cryo-transmission electron microscopy study.
    Ziserman L, Abezgauz L, Ramon O, Raghavan SR, Danino D.
    Langmuir; 2009 Sep 15; 25(18):10483-9. PubMed ID: 19572608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Chemical selectivity in micellar electrokinetic chromatography: characterization of solute-micelle interactions for classification of surfactants.
    Yang S, Khaledi MG.
    Anal Chem; 1995 Feb 01; 67(3):499-510. PubMed ID: 7893000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 29.