These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

173 related items for PubMed ID: 14696834

  • 1. Cone beam CT for pre-surgical assessment of implant sites.
    Hatcher DC, Dial C, Mayorga C.
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2003 Nov; 31(11):825-33. PubMed ID: 14696834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Dental imaging in implant treatment planning.
    Chan HL, Misch K, Wang HL.
    Implant Dent; 2010 Aug; 19(4):288-98. PubMed ID: 20683285
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Radiologic techniques using CBCT and 3-D treatment planning for implant placement.
    Peck JN, Conte GJ.
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2008 Apr; 36(4):287-90, 292-4, 296-7. PubMed ID: 18481625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Accuracy of implant placement based on pre-surgical planning of three-dimensional cone-beam images: a pilot study.
    Van Assche N, van Steenberghe D, Guerrero ME, Hirsch E, Schutyser F, Quirynen M, Jacobs R.
    J Clin Periodontol; 2007 Sep; 34(9):816-21. PubMed ID: 17716317
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Defining new paradigms for assessment of implant receptor sites. The use of CT/CBCT and interactive virtual treatment planning for congenitally missing lateral incisors.
    Ganz SD.
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2008 Jun; 29(5):256-8, 260-2, 264-7; quiz 268, 278. PubMed ID: 18795643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Presurgical implant-site assessment and restoratively driven digital planning.
    Scherer MD.
    Dent Clin North Am; 2014 Jul; 58(3):561-95. PubMed ID: 24993924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The evolution and application of dental maxillofacial imaging modalities.
    White SC, Pharoah MJ.
    Dent Clin North Am; 2008 Oct; 52(4):689-705, v. PubMed ID: 18805224
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Characteristics of a newly developed dentomaxillofacial X-ray cone beam CT scanner (CB MercuRay): system configuration and physical properties.
    Araki K, Maki K, Seki K, Sakamaki K, Harata Y, Sakaino R, Okano T, Seo K.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 15140823
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. State-of-the-art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement.
    Guerrero ME, Jacobs R, Loubele M, Schutyser F, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2006 Mar; 10(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16482455
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Optimization of cone beam CT exposure for pre-surgical evaluation of the implant site.
    Dawood A, Brown J, Sauret-Jackson V, Purkayastha S.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Jan; 41(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 22184628
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Position statement of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology on selection criteria for the use of radiology in dental implantology with emphasis on cone beam computed tomography.
    Tyndall DA, Price JB, Tetradis S, Ganz SD, Hildebolt C, Scarfe WC, American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Jun; 113(6):817-26. PubMed ID: 22668710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.