These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1015 related items for PubMed ID: 14703758

  • 1. Porcelain versus composite inlays/onlays: effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown flexure.
    Magne P, Belser UC.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Dec; 23(6):543-55. PubMed ID: 14703758
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Strength estimation of different designs of ceramic inlays and onlays in molars based on the Tsai-Wu failure criterion.
    Dejak B, Mlotkowski A, Romanowicz M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Aug; 98(2):89-100. PubMed ID: 17692590
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Efficient 3D finite element analysis of dental restorative procedures using micro-CT data.
    Magne P.
    Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):539-48. PubMed ID: 16730058
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study.
    Ausiello P, Rengo S, Davidson CL, Watts DC.
    Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):862-72. PubMed ID: 15451242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A comparison of mvM stress of inlays, onlays and endocrowns made from various materials and their bonding with molars in a computer simulation of mastication - FEA.
    Dejak B, Młotkowski A.
    Dent Mater; 2020 Jul; 36(7):854-864. PubMed ID: 32473834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of the biomechanical behavior of maxillary central incisors restored by means of endocrowns compared to a natural tooth: a 3D static linear finite elements analysis.
    Zarone F, Sorrentino R, Apicella D, Valentino B, Ferrari M, Aversa R, Apicella A.
    Dent Mater; 2006 Nov; 22(11):1035-44. PubMed ID: 16406084
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Cumulative effects of successive restorative procedures on anterior crown flexure: intact versus veneered incisors.
    Magne P, Douglas WH.
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Jan; 31(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 11203907
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 51.