These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

72 related items for PubMed ID: 1474222

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Synthetic two-formant vowel perception by some of the better cochlear-implant patients.
    Tyler RS, Tye-Murray N, Moore BC, McCabe BF.
    Audiology; 1989; 28(6):301-15. PubMed ID: 2532003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Auditory consonant and word recognition skills of cochlear implant users.
    Tye-Murray N, Tyler RS.
    Ear Hear; 1989 Oct; 10(5):292-8. PubMed ID: 2792582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS, Kreft HA.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Ten-year follow-up of a consecutive series of children with multichannel cochlear implants.
    Uziel AS, Sillon M, Vieu A, Artieres F, Piron JP, Daures JP, Mondain M.
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):615-28. PubMed ID: 17667770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Recorded From Nucleus Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.
    Brown CJ, Jeon EK, Chiou LK, Kirby B, Karsten SA, Turner CW, Abbas PJ.
    Ear Hear; 2015 Aug; 36(6):723-32. PubMed ID: 26295607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Tone recognition and electrode discrimination in prelingually deafened cochlear-implant listeners].
    Wei CG, Cao KL, Chen XW, Jin X, Zheng ZY, Zeng FG.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Feb; 39(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 15195586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.
    Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Baskent D, Wang X.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1150-63. PubMed ID: 11519582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Vowel and consonant identification tests can be used to compare performances in a multilingual group of cochlear implant patients.
    Pelizzone M, Boëx C, Montandon P.
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1993 Aug; 55(6):341-6. PubMed ID: 8265119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Open-set word recognition with the 3M/Vienna single-channel cochlear implant.
    Tyler RS.
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1988 Oct; 114(10):1123-6. PubMed ID: 3415819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Cochlear implant outcomes in adults and adolescents with early-onset hearing loss.
    Caposecco A, Hickson L, Pedley K.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Oct; 33(2):209-20. PubMed ID: 21934504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Temporal cues for consonant recognition: training, talker generalization, and use in evaluation of cochlear implants.
    Van Tasell DJ, Greenfield DG, Logemann JJ, Nelson DA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Sep; 92(3):1247-57. PubMed ID: 1401513
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing.
    Gantz BJ, Turner C, Gfeller KE, Lowder MW.
    Laryngoscope; 2005 May; 115(5):796-802. PubMed ID: 15867642
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 4.