These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

212 related items for PubMed ID: 14753229

  • 1. [WMN: a negative ERPs component related to working memory during non-target visual stimuli processing].
    Zhao L, Wei JH.
    Space Med Med Eng (Beijing); 2003 Oct; 16(5):322-5. PubMed ID: 14753229
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Temporal and spatial features of slow positive potential related to visual selective response during head-down-tilt.
    Wei J, Zhao L, Yan G, Chen W, Ren W, Duan R.
    Space Med Med Eng (Beijing); 1998 Jun; 11(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 11541413
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Memory-induced modulation of event-related potentials in frontal cortex of human subjects: a divided visual field study.
    Nowicka A, Szatkowska I.
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Apr 15; 359(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 15050691
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Spatio-temporal modeling of evoked brain activity during memory encoding and target comparison in visual tasks.
    Mnatsakanian EV, Tarkka IM.
    Brain Topogr; 2007 Apr 15; 20(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 17641965
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Stimulus context determines whether non-target stimuli are processed as task-relevant or distractor information.
    Sawaki R, Katayama J.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Nov 15; 117(11):2532-9. PubMed ID: 17005448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A, Stelmack RM, Campbell KB.
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar 17; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. P3 event-related evoked potential in young adults.
    Tandon OP.
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 1990 Jul 17; 34(3):191-4. PubMed ID: 2286422
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The categorization of natural scenes: brain attention networks revealed by dense sensor ERPs.
    Codispoti M, Ferrari V, Junghöfer M, Schupp HT.
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug 15; 32(2):583-91. PubMed ID: 16750397
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Binge drinking affects attentional and visual working memory processing in young university students.
    Crego A, Holguín SR, Parada M, Mota N, Corral M, Cadaveira F.
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2009 Nov 15; 33(11):1870-9. PubMed ID: 19673739
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Task switching and novelty processing activate a common neural network for cognitive control.
    Barcelo F, Escera C, Corral MJ, Periáñez JA.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Oct 15; 18(10):1734-48. PubMed ID: 17014377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.