These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

353 related items for PubMed ID: 14759985

  • 1. Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system.
    Gur D, Sumkin JH, Rockette HE, Ganott M, Hakim C, Hardesty L, Poller WR, Shah R, Wallace L.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Feb 04; 96(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 14759985
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography.
    Fenton JJ, Taplin SH, Carney PA, Abraham L, Sickles EA, D'Orsi C, Berns EA, Cutter G, Hendrick RE, Barlow WE, Elmore JG.
    N Engl J Med; 2007 Apr 05; 356(14):1399-409. PubMed ID: 17409321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography.
    Ko JM, Nicholas MJ, Mendel JB, Slanetz PJ.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec 05; 187(6):1483-91. PubMed ID: 17114541
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Re: Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system.
    Feig SA, Sickles EA, Evans WP, Linver MN.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Aug 18; 96(16):1260-1; author reply 1261. PubMed ID: 15316065
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effectiveness of computer-aided detection in community mammography practice.
    Fenton JJ, Abraham L, Taplin SH, Geller BM, Carney PA, D'Orsi C, Elmore JG, Barlow WE, Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Aug 03; 103(15):1152-61. PubMed ID: 21795668
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Breast cancer screening results 5 years after introduction of digital mammography in a population-based screening program.
    Karssemeijer N, Bluekens AM, Beijerinck D, Deurenberg JJ, Beekman M, Visser R, van Engen R, Bartels-Kortland A, Broeders MJ.
    Radiology; 2009 Nov 03; 253(2):353-8. PubMed ID: 19703851
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Interpretive Performance and Inter-Observer Agreement on Digital Mammography Test Sets.
    Kim SH, Lee EH, Jun JK, Kim YM, Chang YW, Lee JH, Kim HW, Choi EJ, Alliance for Breast Cancer Screening in Korea (ABCS-K).
    Korean J Radiol; 2019 Feb 03; 20(2):218-224. PubMed ID: 30672161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.