These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
393 related items for PubMed ID: 14770019
1. Auditory steady-state responses and word recognition scores in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults. Dimitrijevic A, John MS, Picton TW. Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):68-84. PubMed ID: 14770019 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners. Burk MH, Humes LE, Amos NE, Strauser LE. Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Human auditory steady-state responses to tones independently modulated in both frequency and amplitude. Dimitrijevic A, John MS, van Roon P, Picton TW. Ear Hear; 2001 Apr; 22(2):100-11. PubMed ID: 11324839 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Human auditory steady-state responses during sweeps of intensity. Picton TW, van Roon P, John MS. Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):542-57. PubMed ID: 17609615 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Multiple auditory steady-state response thresholds to bone-conduction stimuli in young infants with normal hearing. Small SA, Stapells DR. Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 16672791 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response. Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB, Dubno JR. Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training. Nikjeh DA, Lister JJ, Frisch SA. Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech. Dubno JR, Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB. Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficient stimuli for evoking auditory steady-state responses. John MS, Dimitrijevic A, Picton TW. Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):406-23. PubMed ID: 14534411 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids. Davidson LS. Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Contribution of high frequencies to speech recognition in quiet and noise in listeners with varying degrees of high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. Amos NE, Humes LE. J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):819-34. PubMed ID: 17675588 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech reception thresholds in noise and self-reported hearing disability in a general adult population. Smits C, Kramer SE, Houtgast T. Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 16957503 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of brief-tone stimulus duration on the brain stem auditory steady-state response. Mo L, Stapells DR. Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):121-33. PubMed ID: 18091096 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Intelligibility of speech in noise at high presentation levels: effects of hearing loss and frequency region. Summers V, Cord MT. J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17672659 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Effective masking levels for 500 and 2000 Hz bone conduction auditory steady state responses in infants and adults with normal hearing. Small SA, Smyth A, Leon G. Ear Hear; 2014 Aug; 35(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 24121647 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Hearing aid accessories for adults: the remote FM microphone. Boothroyd A. Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 14770015 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Speech masking release in listeners with flat hearing loss: effects of masker fluctuation rate on identification scores and phonetic feature reception. Lorenzi C, Husson M, Ardoint M, Debruille X. Int J Audiol; 2006 Sep; 45(9):487-95. PubMed ID: 17005491 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study. Morera C, Manrique M, Ramos A, Garcia-Ibanez L, Cavalle L, Huarte A, Castillo C, Estrada E. Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Auditory evoked potentials in the detection of interaural intensity differences in children and adults. Wambacq IJ, Koehnke J, Shea-Miller KJ, Besing J, Toth V, Abubakr A. Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):320-31. PubMed ID: 17485981 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]