These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

286 related items for PubMed ID: 1486263

  • 1. [Visual acuity perimetry. Detection of glaucomatous visual field defects].
    Reiser EM, Lachenmayr BJ, Vivell PM.
    Ophthalmologe; 1992 Dec; 89(6):472-6. PubMed ID: 1486263
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Effect of artificial media opacities on Frisén ring perimetry and conventional light sense perimetry. A comparative study].
    Meyer JH, Funk J.
    Ophthalmologe; 1994 Apr; 91(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 8012128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Detection of glaucomatous visual field defects using masking campimetry].
    Damm G, Lachenmayr BJ, Vivell PM.
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1991 Apr; 88(6):838-42. PubMed ID: 1794816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Diffuse and localized glaucomatous visual field changes in light sense, flicker and visual acuity perimetry. Evidence of pressure damage].
    Lachenmayr BJ, Drance SM, Chauhan BC, House PH, Lalani S.
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1991 Apr; 88(5):530-7. PubMed ID: 1757044
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of contrast sensitivity, visual acuity, and Humphrey visual field testing in patients with glaucoma.
    Wilensky JT, Hawkins A.
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2001 Apr; 99():213-7; discussion 217-8. PubMed ID: 11797309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [White-noise field campimetry before and after artificial increase of intraocular pressure. Possible applications in diagnosis and evaluation of glaucoma].
    Schiefer U, Ulrich WD, Ulrich C, Wilhelm H, Aulhorn E.
    Ophthalmologe; 1992 Dec; 89(6):477-88. PubMed ID: 1486264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Effect of faulty refraction and artificial media opacities on visual acuity perimetry].
    Hölzl MJ, Lachenmayr BJ, Vivell PM.
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1991 Dec; 88(6):875-80. PubMed ID: 1794825
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Changes in the visual field caused by lens opacities].
    Heider HW, Seez KJ, Schnaudigel OE.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1991 Jan; 198(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 2023367
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Correlation between glaucomatous hemifield scotomas in white-on-white perimetry and blue-on-yellow perimetry using the oculus twinfield perimeter].
    Denk PO, Markovic M, Knorr M.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 Feb; 221(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 14986209
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Frequency-doubling perimetry in examination of open-angle glaucoma with hemifield defect].
    Wu L, Suzuki Y, Kunimatsu S, Araie M, Yao K.
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Dec; 38(12):717-20. PubMed ID: 12654219
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of the Humphrey Field Analyser and Humphrey Matrix Perimeter for the evaluation of glaucoma patients.
    Chen YH, Wu JN, Chen JT, Lu DW.
    Ophthalmologica; 2008 Dec; 222(6):400-7. PubMed ID: 18781091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.
    Iwase A, Tomidokoro A, Araie M, Shirato S, Shimizu H, Kitazawa Y, Tajimi Study Group.
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Application of frequency doubling technology perimetry in the diagnosis of glaucoma].
    Kawa P, Jurkowska J, Zarnowski T, Zagórski Z.
    Klin Oczna; 2002 Jan; 104(5-6):391-4. PubMed ID: 12664488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Visual field assessment in glaucoma: comparative evaluation of manual kinetic Goldmann perimetry and automated static perimetry.
    Agarwal HC, Gulati V, Sihota R.
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2000 Dec; 48(4):301-6. PubMed ID: 11340889
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Indications for stimulus 3 and 5 in automatic perimetry. Preliminary results].
    Zulauf M, Caprioli J.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1994 May; 204(5):407-8. PubMed ID: 8051884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Short-wavelength perimetry in diagnosis of early glaucoma: comparison with standard automated perimetry].
    Qi S, Jiang Y.
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Jan; 38(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 11955298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Quantification and progression of the visual field defect in glaucoma without hypertension, glaucoma simplex and pigmentary glaucoma. A clinical study with the Delta Program of the 201 Octopus perimeter].
    Gramer E, Althaus G.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1987 Sep; 191(3):184-98. PubMed ID: 3682683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N, Giangiacomo A, Fontana H, Hoffman D, Caprioli J.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Sensitivity of noise field campimetry as a screening method for glaucoma].
    Gramer E, Roesen B, Siebert M.
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1991 Feb; 88(5):538-45. PubMed ID: 1757045
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Glaucomatous visual field damage. Luminance and color-contrast sensitivities.
    Hart WM, Silverman SE, Trick GL, Nesher R, Gordon MO.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1990 Feb; 31(2):359-67. PubMed ID: 2303333
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.