These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


162 related items for PubMed ID: 149076

  • 1. [Thermoluminescent dosimetry for radiation exposure of the breast during film and xeromammography (author's transl)].
    Säbel M, Ruff A, Weishaar J.
    Rofo; 1978 May; 128(5):616-22. PubMed ID: 149076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Radiation exposure in x-ray mammography].
    Säbel M, Aichinger U, Schulz-Wendtland R.
    Rofo; 2001 Feb; 173(2):79-91. PubMed ID: 11253092
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Thermoluminescent dosimeters for in vivo measurement of radiation exposure and related dose in mammography.
    Omran HA.
    Radiol Technol; 1982 Feb; 53(5):383-92. PubMed ID: 6927768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Radiation dose during mammography using various recording systems (author's transl)].
    Heep HH, Bülow-Johansen T, Klemencic J, Wegwitz J.
    Rofo; 1978 Sep; 129(3):364-7. PubMed ID: 151056
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Absorbed dose in xeromammography.
    Zárand P, Péntek Z.
    Br J Radiol; 1980 Feb; 53(626):114-9. PubMed ID: 7370491
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Diagnostic significance of high-filtration xeromammography in relation to radiation hazard and image quality (author's transl)].
    John V, Ewen K.
    Rontgenblatter; 1978 Jun; 31(6):326-8. PubMed ID: 675061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Evaluation of radiation doses in mammography].
    Lee SK, Hwang SK, Lee LN, Lou GC, Wang CA, Hsu WJ.
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 1993 Mar; 51(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 8490794
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [New aspects in evaluation of the average-absorbed dose of the parenchyma in mammography (author's transl)].
    Schneider G, Kindl P, Spreizer H.
    Rofo; 1978 Jan; 128(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 146669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a selenium flat-panel detector].
    Gosch D, Jendrass S, Scholz M, Kahn T.
    Rofo; 2006 Jul; 178(7):693-7. PubMed ID: 16761214
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Breast exposure: nationwide trends; a mammographic quality assurance program--results to date.
    Jensen JE, Butler PF.
    Radiol Technol; 1978 Jul; 50(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 264140
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Real-time estimation system for mean glandular dose in mammography.
    Matsumoto M, Inoue S, Honda I, Yamamoto S, Ueguchi T, Ogata Y, Johkoh T.
    Radiat Med; 2003 Jul; 21(6):280-4. PubMed ID: 14743903
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Image quality in film and xero-mammography. I. Rendering of low contrast values (author's transl)].
    Säbel M, Paterok EM, Weishaar J, Willgeroth F.
    Rofo; 1977 Jun; 126(6):529-36. PubMed ID: 142714
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.