These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Dynamic range of the contralateral stapedius reflex in cochlear implant patients. Stephan K, Welzl-Müller K, Stiglbrunner H. Scand Audiol; 1990 Aug; 19(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 2371534 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Stapedius reflex measurements during surgery for cochlear implantation in children. van den Borne B, Snik AF, Mens LH, Brokx JP, van den Broek P. Am J Otol; 1996 Jul; 17(4):554-8. PubMed ID: 8841700 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparisons between neural response imaging thresholds, electrically evoked auditory reflex thresholds and most comfortable loudness levels in CII bionic ear users with HiResolution sound processing strategies. Han DM, Chen XQ, Zhao XT, Kong Y, Li YX, Liu S, Liu B, Mo LY. Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):732-5. PubMed ID: 16012035 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of electrically elicited stapedius reflex threshold measured through three different cochlear implant systems. Opie JM, Allum JH, Probst R. Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S107-8. PubMed ID: 9391620 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Contralateral electrically evoked reflex of the musculus stapedius in patients with cochlear implant]. Potalova LA. Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2003 Nov; (6):38-40. PubMed ID: 14671578 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Evoked stapedius reflex and compound action potential thresholds versus most comfortable loudness level: assessment of their relation for charge-based fitting strategies in implant users. Walkowiak A, Lorens A, Polak M, Kostek B, Skarzynski H, Szkielkowska A, Skarzynski PH. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2011 Nov; 73(4):189-95. PubMed ID: 21659787 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Stapedius reflex in patients with an inner ear prosthesis. Stephan K, Welzl-Müller K. Int J Artif Organs; 1992 Jul; 15(7):436-9. PubMed ID: 1516996 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the Tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor. Alvarez I, de la Torre A, Sainz M, Roldán C, Schoesser H, Spitzer P. Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 19838116 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Electromyographical recording of the electrically elicited stapedius reflex via a bipolar hook electrode. Pau HW, Zehlicke T, Sievert U, Schaudel D, Behrend D, Dahl R. Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jan; 30(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18833019 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of stimulus duration on stapedius reflex threshold in electrical stimulation via cochlear implant. Stephan K, Welzl-Müller K. Audiology; 1994 Jan; 33(3):143-51. PubMed ID: 8042935 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. How reliable is visual assessment of the electrically elicited stapedius reflex threshold during cochlear implant surgery, compared with tympanometry? Pau HW, Ehrt K, Just T, Sievert U, Dahl R. J Laryngol Otol; 2011 Mar; 125(3):271-3. PubMed ID: 21054912 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Evolution of cochlear implant arrays result in changes in behavioral and physiological responses in children. Gordin A, Papsin B, James A, Gordon K. Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):908-15. PubMed ID: 19730148 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Dose-dependent suppression of the electrically elicited stapedius reflex by general anesthetics in children undergoing cochlear implant surgery. Crawford MW, White MC, Propst EJ, Zaarour C, Cushing S, Pehora C, James AL, Gordon KA, Papsin BC. Anesth Analg; 2009 May; 108(5):1480-7. PubMed ID: 19372325 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]